Psychosocial work exposures and health outcomes: a meta-review of 72 literature reviews with meta-analysis
- PMID: 34042163
- PMCID: PMC8504166
- DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.3968
Psychosocial work exposures and health outcomes: a meta-review of 72 literature reviews with meta-analysis
Abstract
Objective: This meta-review aimed to present all available quantitative pooled estimates for the associations between psychosocial work exposures and health outcomes using a systematic literature review of literature reviews with meta-analysis.
Methods: A systematic review of the literature from 2000 to 2020 was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and PsycINFO databases following the PRISMA guidelines. All literature reviews and Individual-Participant Data (IPD)-Work consortium studies exploring an association between psychosocial work exposures and health outcomes and providing pooled estimates using meta-analysis were included. All types of psychosocial work exposures and health outcomes were studied. The quality of each included review was assessed.
Results: A total of 72 reviews and IPD-Work consortium studies were included. These mainly focused on job strain as exposure and cardiovascular diseases and mental disorders as outcomes. The associations between psychosocial work factors and cardiovascular diseases and mental disorders were in general significant, and the magnitude of these associations was stronger for mental disorders than for cardiovascular diseases. Based on high-quality reviews, significant associations were found between job/high strain and long working hours as exposures and coronary heart diseases, (ischemic) stroke, and depression as outcomes. A few additional significant associations involved other exposures and health outcomes.
Conclusions: The included reviews brought convincing findings on the associations of some psychosocial work factors with mental disorders and cardiovascular diseases. More research may be needed to explain these associations, explore other exposures and outcomes, and make progress towards determining the causality of the associations.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures
Comment in
-
Understanding the impact of psychosocial working conditions on workers' health: we have come a long way, but are we there yet?Scand J Work Environ Health. 2021 Oct 1;47(7):483-487. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3984. Epub 2021 Sep 3. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2021. PMID: 34477882 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Alfredsson L, Karasek R, Theorell T. Myocardial infarction risk and psychosocial work environment: an analysis of the male Swedish working force. Soc Sci Med. 1982;16(4):463–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(82)90054-5. - PubMed
-
- Alfredsson L, Spetz CL, Theorell T. Type of occupation and near-future hospitalization for myocardial infarction and some other diagnoses. Int J Epidemiol. 1985 Sep;14(3):378–88. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/14.3.378. - PubMed
-
- Karasek R, Baker D, Marxer F, Ahlbom A, Theorell T. Job decision latitude, job demands, and cardiovascular disease: a prospective study of Swedish men. Am J Public Health. 1981 Jul;71(7):694–705. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.71.7.694. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Kittel F, Kornitzer M, Dramaik M. Coronary heart disease and job stress in two cohorts of bank clerks. Psychother Psychosom. 1980;34(2-3):110–23. https://doi.org/10.1159/000287453. - PubMed
-
- Theorell T, Alfredsson L, Knox S, Perski A, Svensson J, Waller D. On the interplay between socioeconomic factors, personality and work environment in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1984;10(6 Spec No):373–80. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
