Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun;19(3):228-240.
doi: 10.1089/bio.2021.0011. Epub 2021 May 27.

Recommendations for a Dutch Sustainable Biobanking Environment

Affiliations

Recommendations for a Dutch Sustainable Biobanking Environment

Rogier van der Stijl et al. Biopreserv Biobank. 2021 Jun.

Abstract

Biobanks and their collections are considered essential for contemporary biomedical research and a critical resource toward personalized medicine. However, they need to operate in a sustainable manner to prevent research waste and maximize impact. Sustainability is the capacity of a biobank to remain operative, effective, and competitive over its expected lifetime. This remains a challenge given a biobank's position at the interplay of ethical, societal, scientific, and commercial values and the difficulties in finding continuous funding. In the end, biobanks are responsible for their own sustainability. Still, biobanks also depend on their surrounding environment, which contains overarching legislative, policy, financial, and other factors that can either impede or promote sustainability. The Biobanking and Biomolecular Research Infrastructure for The Netherlands (BBMRI.nl) has worked on improving the national environment for sustainable biobanking. In this article, we present the final outcomes of this BBMRI.nl project. First, we summarize the current overarching challenges of the Dutch biobanking landscape. These challenges were gathered during workshops and focus groups with Dutch biobanks and their users, for which the full results are described in separate reports. The main overarching challenges relate to sample and data quality, funding, use and reuse, findability and accessibility, and the general image of biobanks. Second, we propose a package of recommendations-across nine themes-toward creating overarching conditions that stimulate and enable sustainable biobanking. These recommendations serve as a guideline for the Dutch biobanking community and their stakeholders to jointly work toward practical implementation and a better biobanking environment. There are undoubtedly parallels between the Dutch situation and the challenges found in other countries. We hope that sharing our project's approach, outcomes, and recommendations will support other countries in their efforts toward sustainable biobanking.

Keywords: biobank; macro-environment; overarching challenges; policy recommendations; sustainability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report potential political conflicts of interest. P.M. is director of the Radboud Biobank, the centralized biobank infrastructure of the Radboudumc Nijmegen and R.v.d.S. is project manager of the UMCG Cohort and Biobank Coordination Hub. Several of the recommendations are positive toward such infrastructures. In addition, P.M. will function as one of the two coordinators of the new Health-RI Biobank Community, which is the effectuation of one of the recommendations. She was not yet a community coordinator when the recommendations were drafted. More likely, her involvement in this BBMRI.nl project made her a prime candidate for coordinating the new community. P.M., R.v.d.S., and L.E. report no other conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
Recommendations for a sustainable biobanking environment across nine themes. To create an environment for sustainable biobanking in the Netherlands steps have to be taken on nine themes. Each theme contains one or more recommendations (Table 1). Eight stakeholder groups play a central role in translating these recommendations into practice.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gee S, Georghiou L, Oliver R, et al. Financing UK biobanks: Rationale for a National Biobanking Research Infrastructure, 2013, Strategic Tissue Repository Alliances Through Unified Methods (STRATUM). https://www.escholar.manchester.ac.uk/api/datastream?publicationPid=uk-a... (accessed December22, 2020)
    1. Henderson GE, Cadigan RJ, Edwards TP, et al. . Characterizing biobank organizations in the U.S.: Results from a national survey. Genome Med 2013;5:3. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Watson PH. Biobank classification: Communicating biorepository diversity. Biopreserv Biobank 2014;12:163–164 - PubMed
    1. Kinkorova J. Biobanks in the era of personalized medicine: Objectives, challenges, and innovation: Overview. EPMA J 2016;7:4. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hewitt R, Watson P. Defining biobank. Biopreserv Biobank 2013;11:309–315 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources