Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2021 May 27;23(5):e24003.
doi: 10.2196/24003.

Patient Recruitment Into a Multicenter Clinical Cohort Linking Electronic Health Records From 5 Health Systems: Cross-sectional Analysis

Wendy L Bennett  1 , Carolyn T Bramante  2 , Scott D Rothenberger  3 , Jennifer L Kraschnewski  4 , Sharon J Herring  5 , Michelle R Lent  6 , Jeanne M Clark  1 , Molly B Conroy  7 , Harold Lehmann  1 , Nickie Cappella  3 , Megan Gauvey-Kern  1 , Jody McCullough  4 , Kathleen M McTigue  3
Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Patient Recruitment Into a Multicenter Clinical Cohort Linking Electronic Health Records From 5 Health Systems: Cross-sectional Analysis

Wendy L Bennett et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: There is growing interest in identifying and recruiting research participants from health systems using electronic health records (EHRs). However, few studies have described the practical aspects of the recruitment process or compared electronic recruitment methods to in-person recruitment, particularly across health systems.

Objective: The objective of this study was to describe the steps and efficiency of the recruitment process and participant characteristics by recruitment strategy.

Methods: EHR-based eligibility criteria included being an adult patient engaged in outpatient primary or bariatric surgery care at one of 5 health systems in the PaTH Clinical Research Network and having ≥2 weight measurements and 1 height measurement recorded in their EHR within the last 5 years. Recruitment strategies varied by site and included one or more of the following methods: (1) in-person recruitment by study staff from clinical sites, (2) US postal mail recruitment letters, (3) secure email, and (4) direct EHR recruitment through secure patient web portals. We used descriptive statistics to evaluate participant characteristics and proportion of patients recruited (ie, efficiency) by modality.

Results: The total number of eligible patients from the 5 health systems was 5,051,187. Of these, 40,048 (0.8%) were invited to enter an EHR-based cohort study and 1085 were enrolled. Recruitment efficiency was highest for in-person recruitment (33.5%), followed by electronic messaging (2.9%), including email (2.9%) and EHR patient portal messages (2.9%). Overall, 779 (65.7%) patients were enrolled through electronic messaging, which also showed greater rates of recruitment of Black patients compared with the other strategies.

Conclusions: We recruited a total of 1085 patients from primary care and bariatric surgery settings using 4 recruitment strategies. The recruitment efficiency was 2.9% for email and EHR patient portals, with the majority of participants recruited electronically. This study can inform the design of future research studies using EHR-based recruitment.

Keywords: bariatric; clinical research network; cohort; cohort study design; efficiency; electronic health record; eligibility; enrollment; health system; primary care; process; recruitment; recruitment methods; research; surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Recruitment flow of participants enrolled into the cohort from 5 health systems using 4 recruitment strategies. EHR: electronic health record.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Distribution of participants by recruitment site (sites A to E) and recruitment strategy. (A) Primary care clinic participants (n=907). (B) Bariatric surgery clinic participants (n=278).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Gleason KT, Ford DE, Gumas D, Woods B, Appel L, Murray P, Meyer M, Dennison Himmelfarb CR. Development and preliminary evaluation of a patient portal messaging for research recruitment service. J Clin Transl Sci. 2018 Feb;2(1):53–56. doi: 10.1017/cts.2018.10. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/31660218 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Heerman WJ, Jackson N, Roumie CL, Harris PA, Rosenbloom ST, Pulley J, Wilkins CH, Williams NA, Crenshaw D, Leak C, Scherdin J, Muñoz D, Bachmann J, Rothman RL, Kripalani S. Recruitment methods for survey research: Findings from the Mid-South Clinical Data Research Network. Contemp Clin Trials. 2017 Nov;62:50–55. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2017.08.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. van Staa T, Goldacre B, Buchan I, Smeeth L. Big health data: the need to earn public trust. BMJ. 2016 Jul 14;354:i3636. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i3636. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cowie MR, Blomster JI, Curtis LH, Duclaux S, Ford I, Fritz F, Goldman S, Janmohamed S, Kreuzer J, Leenay M, Michel A, Ong S, Pell JP, Southworth MR, Stough WG, Thoenes M, Zannad F, Zalewski A. Electronic health records to facilitate clinical research. Clin Res Cardiol. 2017 Jan;106(1):1–9. doi: 10.1007/s00392-016-1025-6. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/27557678 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sherman RE, Anderson SA, Dal Pan GJ, Gray GW, Gross T, Hunter NL, LaVange L, Marinac-Dabic D, Marks PW, Robb MA, Shuren J, Temple R, Woodcock J, Yue LQ, Califf RM. Real-World Evidence - What Is It and What Can It Tell Us? N Engl J Med. 2016 Dec 08;375(23):2293–2297. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb1609216. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources