Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun 22;101(6):adv00478.
doi: 10.2340/00015555-3839.

Locoregional Treatments for Digital Ulcers in Systemic Sclerosis: A Systematic Review

Affiliations

Locoregional Treatments for Digital Ulcers in Systemic Sclerosis: A Systematic Review

Ingrid Costedoat et al. Acta Derm Venereol. .

Abstract

The management of digital ulcers in systemic sclerosis is difficult. While the 2017 European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) guidelines clearly defined the use of systemic therapies for digital ulcers, little is known about the efficacy of locoregional treatments. The aim of this review is to systematically assess the spectrum of published locoregional therapies for digital ulcers. A total of 58 studies were included. Among the different locoregional treatment strategies described, injections of fat-derived cells and botulinum toxin showed promising results in the reduction of pain and the number of digital ulcers. By contrast, this review found that sympathectomy yielded disappointing results, with low rates of effectiveness and frequent recurrence. For other treatments, such as hyperbaric oxygen therapy, phototherapy (ultraviolet A), low-level light therapy, intermittent compression, Waon therapy, extracorporeal shockwave, vitamin E gel, and topical dimethyl sulphoxide, the conflicting results or limited published data reflected the low level of evidence. Larger randomized clinical trials are required to confirm the validity of promising techniques.

Keywords: botulinum toxin; digital ulcers; fat-derived cells; systematic review; systemic sclerosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart of study selection showing strategy used to include publications. SSc: systemic sclerosis; EULAR/ACR: European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Denton CP, Khanna D. Systemic sclerosis. Lancet 2017; 390: 1685–1699. - PubMed
    1. Meunier P, Dequidt L, Barnetche T, Lazaro E, Duffau P, Richez C, et al. . Increased risk of mortality in systemic sclerosis-associated digital ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2019; 33: 405–409. - PubMed
    1. Hughes M, Herrick AL. Digital ulcers in systemic sclerosis. Rheumatol Oxf Engl 2017; 56: 14–25. - PubMed
    1. Kowal-Bielecka O, Landewé R, Avouac J, Chwiesko S, Miniati I, Czirjak L, et al. . EULAR recommendations for the treatment of systemic sclerosis: a report from the EULAR Scleroderma Trials and Research group (EUSTAR). Ann Rheum Dis 2009; 68: 620–628. - PubMed
    1. Kowal-Bielecka O, Fransen J, Avouac J, Becker M, Kulak A, Allanore Y, et al. . Update of EULAR recommendations for the treatment of systemic sclerosis. Ann Rheum Dis 2017; 76: 1327–1339. - PubMed

Publication types