Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 May;1(5):e136.
doi: 10.1002/cpz1.136.

CRISPR Screens in Toxicology Research: An Overview

Affiliations
Review

CRISPR Screens in Toxicology Research: An Overview

Amin Sobh et al. Curr Protoc. 2021 May.

Abstract

The use of genome editing tools is expanding our understanding of various human diseases by providing insight into gene-disease interactions. Despite the recognized role of toxicants in the development of human health issues and conditions, there is currently limited characterization of their mechanisms of action, and the application of CRISPR-based genome editing to the study of toxicants could help in the identification of novel gene-environment interactions. CRISPR-based functional screens enable identification of cellular mechanisms fundamental for response and susceptibility to a given toxicant. The aim of this review is to inform future directions in the application of CRISPR technologies in toxicological studies. We review and compare different types of CRISPR-based methods including pooled, anchored, combinatorial, and perturb-sequencing screens in vitro, in addition to pooled screenings in model organisms. © 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Keywords: CRISPR; genome editing; toxicology.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

LITERATURE CITED

    1. Abdelrahman, M., Al-Sadi, A. M., Pour-Aboughadareh, A., Burritt, D. J., & Tran, L.-S. P. (2018). Genome editing using CRISPR/Cas9-targeted mutagenesis: an opportunity for yield improvements of crop plants grown under environmental stresses. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 131, 31-36. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.03.012.
    1. Agrotis, A., & Ketteler, R. (2015). A new age in functional genomics using CRISPR/Cas9 in arrayed library screening. Frontiers in Genetics, 6, 300. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2015.00300.
    1. Auer, T. O., Duroure, K., De Cian, A., Concordet, J.-P., & Del Bene, F. (2014). Highly efficient CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knock-in in zebrafish by homology-independent DNA repair. Genome Research, 24, 142-153. doi: 10.1101/gr.161638.113.
    1. Balik-Meisner, M. R., Mav, D., Phadke, D. P., Everett, L. J., Shah, R. R., Tal, T., … Paules, R. S. (2019). Development of a zebrafish S1500+ sentinel gene set for high-throughput transcriptomics. Zebrafish, 16, 331-347. doi: 10.1089/zeb.2018.1720.
    1. Ben Jehuda, R., Shemer, Y., & Binah, O. (2018). Genome editing in induced pluripotent stem cells using CRISPR/Cas9. Stem Cell Reviews and Reports, 14, 323-336. doi: 10.1007/s12015-018-9811-3.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources