Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May:7:767-781.
doi: 10.1200/GO.21.00001.

Locally Advanced Breast Cancer (LABC): Real-World Outcome of Patients From Cancer Institute, Chennai

Affiliations

Locally Advanced Breast Cancer (LABC): Real-World Outcome of Patients From Cancer Institute, Chennai

Manikandan Dhanushkodi et al. JCO Glob Oncol. 2021 May.

Abstract

Purpose: There are sparse data on the outcome of patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). This report is on the prognostic factors and long-term outcome from Cancer Institute, Chennai.

Methods: This is an analysis of untreated patients with LABC (stages IIIA-C) who were treated from January 2006 to December 2013.

Results: Of the 4,577 patients with breast cancer who were treated, 2,137 patients (47%) with LABC were included for analysis. The median follow-up was 75 months (range, 1-170 months), and 2.3% (n = 49) were lost to follow-up at 5 years. The initial treatment was neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiation (NACR) (77%), neoadjuvant chemotherapy (15%), or others (8%). Patients with triple-negative breast cancer had a pathologic complete response (PCR) of 41%. The 10-year overall survival was for stage IIIA (65.1%), stage IIIB (41.2%), and stage IIIC (26.7%). Recurrence of cancer was observed in 27% of patients (local 13% and distant 87%). Multivariate analysis showed that patients with a tumor size > 10 cm (hazard ratio [HR], 2.19; 95% CI, 1.62 to 2.98; P = .001), hormone receptor negativity (HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.22 to 1.72; P = .001), treatment modality (neoadjuvant chemotherapy, HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.73; P = .001), lack of PCR (HR, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.85 to 3.02; P = .001), and the presence of lymphovascular invasion (HR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.60 to 2.44; P = .001) had decreased overall survival.

Conclusion: NACR was feasible in inoperable LABC and gave satisfactory long-term survival. PCR was significantly higher in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. The tumor size > 10 cm was significantly associated with inferior survival. However, this report acknowledges the limitations inherent in experience of management of LABC from a single center.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
OS of all patients. Kaplan-Meier curve showing the OS of 2,137 patients. Numbers within parentheses are events. OS, overall survival.
FIG 2
FIG 2
DFS of all patients. Kaplan-Meier curve showing the DFS of 2,137 patients. Numbers within parentheses are events. DFS, disease-free survival.
FIG 3
FIG 3
DFS according to stage. Kaplan-Meier curve showing the stagewise DFS. Numbers within parentheses are events. DFS, disease-free survival.
FIG 4
FIG 4
DFS and tumor size. Kaplan-Meier curve showing the DFS according to the tumor size. Numbers within parentheses are events. DFS, disease-free survival.
FIG 5
FIG 5
DFS of patients with TNBC. Kaplan-Meier curve showing the DFS of patients with TNBC. Numbers within parentheses are events. DFS, disease-free survival; TNBC, triple-negative breast cancer.
FIG 6
FIG 6
DFS comparing NACR and NAC. Kaplan-Meier curve comparing DFS of patients treated with NAC and neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiation. Numbers within parentheses are events. DFS, disease-free survival; NAC, neoadjuvant chemotherapy; NACR, XXX.
FIG A1
FIG A1
OS comparing NACR and NAC. Kaplan-Meier curve comparing OS of patients treated with NAC and NACR. Numbers within parentheses are events. HR, hazard ratio; NAC, neoadjuvant chemotherapy; NACR, neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiation; OS, overall survival.

References

    1. Malvia S Bagadi SA Dubey US, et al. : Epidemiology of breast cancer in Indian women. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 13:289-295, 2017 - PubMed
    1. Dhillon PK Mathur P Nandakumar A, et al. : The burden of cancers and their variations across the states of India: The Global Burden of Disease Study 1990–2016. Lancet Oncol 19:1289-1306, 2018 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Manoharan N Nair O Shukla NK, et al. : Descriptive epidemiology of female breast cancer in Delhi, India. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 18:1015-1018, 2017 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nyblade L Stockton M Travasso S, et al. : A qualitative exploration of cervical and breast cancer stigma in Karnataka, India. BMC Womens Health 17:58, 2017 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shanta V Swaminathan R Rama R, et al. : Retrospective analysis of locally advanced noninflammatory breast cancer from Chennai, South India, 1990-1999. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 70:51-58, 2008 - PubMed

MeSH terms