The Abbott PanBio WHO emergency use listed, rapid, antigen-detecting point-of-care diagnostic test for SARS-CoV-2-Evaluation of the accuracy and ease-of-use
- PMID: 34043631
- PMCID: PMC8158996
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247918
The Abbott PanBio WHO emergency use listed, rapid, antigen-detecting point-of-care diagnostic test for SARS-CoV-2-Evaluation of the accuracy and ease-of-use
Abstract
Objectives: Diagnostics are essential for controlling the pandemic. Identifying a reliable and fast diagnostic device is needed for effective testing. We assessed performance and ease-of-use of the Abbott PanBio antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic test (Ag-RDT).
Methods: This prospective, multi-centre diagnostic accuracy study enrolled at two sites in Germany. Following routine testing with reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), a second study-exclusive swab was performed for Ag-RDT testing. Routine swabs were nasopharyngeal (NP) or combined NP/oropharyngeal (OP) whereas the study-exclusive swabs were NP. To evaluate performance, sensitivity and specificity were assessed overall and in predefined sub-analyses accordingly to cycle-threshold values, days after symptom onset, disease severity and study site. Additionally, an ease-of-use assessment (EoU) and System Usability Scale (SUS) were performed.
Results: 1108 participants were enrolled between Sept 28 and Oct 30, 2020. Of these, 106 (9.6%) were PCR-positive. The Abbott PanBio detected 92/106 PCR-positive participants with a sensitivity of 86.8% (95% CI: 79.0% - 92.0%) and a specificity of 99.9% (95% CI: 99.4%-100%). The sub-analyses indicated that sensitivity was 95.8% in Ct-values <25 and within the first seven days from symptom onset. The test was characterized as easy to use (SUS: 86/100) and considered suitable for point-of-care settings.
Conclusion: The Abbott PanBio Ag-RDT performs well for SARS-CoV-2 testing in this large manufacturer independent study, confirming its WHO recommendation for Emergency Use in settings with limited resources.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
Similar articles
-
A Multicenter Clinical Diagnostic Accuracy Study of SureStatus, an Affordable, WHO Emergency Use-Listed, Rapid, Point-Of-Care Antigen-Detecting Diagnostic Test for SARS-CoV-2.Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Oct 26;10(5):e0122922. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01229-22. Epub 2022 Sep 6. Microbiol Spectr. 2022. PMID: 36066256 Free PMC article.
-
Accuracy and ease-of-use of seven point-of-care SARS-CoV-2 antigen-detecting tests: A multi-centre clinical evaluation.EBioMedicine. 2022 Jan;75:103774. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103774. Epub 2021 Dec 24. EBioMedicine. 2022. PMID: 34959134 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Head-to-head performance comparison of self-collected nasal versus professional-collected nasopharyngeal swab for a WHO-listed SARS-CoV-2 antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic test.Med Microbiol Immunol. 2021 Aug;210(4):181-186. doi: 10.1007/s00430-021-00710-9. Epub 2021 May 24. Med Microbiol Immunol. 2021. PMID: 34028625 Free PMC article.
-
Accuracy of rapid point-of-care antigen-based diagnostics for SARS-CoV-2: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression analyzing influencing factors.PLoS Med. 2022 May 26;19(5):e1004011. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004011. eCollection 2022 May. PLoS Med. 2022. PMID: 35617375 Free PMC article.
-
Performance of self-performed SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Front Public Health. 2024 Oct 18;12:1402949. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1402949. eCollection 2024. Front Public Health. 2024. PMID: 39494084 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
ESCMID COVID-19 guidelines: diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2.Clin Microbiol Infect. 2022 Jun;28(6):812-822. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2022.02.011. Epub 2022 Feb 23. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2022. PMID: 35218978 Free PMC article.
-
Low sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen self-tests under laboratory conditions.New Microbes New Infect. 2021 Sep;43:100916. doi: 10.1016/j.nmni.2021.100916. Epub 2021 Jul 13. New Microbes New Infect. 2021. PMID: 34277011 Free PMC article.
-
The New Normal: Delayed Peak SARS-CoV-2 Viral Loads Relative to Symptom Onset and Implications for COVID-19 Testing Programs.Clin Infect Dis. 2024 Feb 17;78(2):301-307. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad582. Clin Infect Dis. 2024. PMID: 37768707 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic accuracy of the Panbio COVID-19 antigen rapid test device for SARS-CoV-2 detection in Kenya, 2021: A field evaluation.PLoS One. 2023 Jan 25;18(1):e0277657. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277657. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 36696882 Free PMC article.
-
Rapid Antigen Test Combined with Chest Computed Tomography to Rule Out COVID-19 in Patients Admitted to the Emergency Department.J Clin Med. 2021 Aug 4;10(16):3455. doi: 10.3390/jcm10163455. J Clin Med. 2021. PMID: 34441750 Free PMC article.
References
-
- World Health Organization. Director-General’s opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19: World Health Organization; 2020. [updated 16.03.202010.11.2020]. https://www.who.int/dg/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-re...
-
- World Health Organization. Antigendetection in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection using rapid immunoassays—Interim Guidance https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/antigen-detection-in-the-diagnos...; 2020. 11.09.2020.
-
- Foundation of Innovative New Diagnsotics. SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic pipeline: Foundation of Innovative New Diagnostics 2020. [https://www.finddx.org/covid-19/pipeline/?avance=all&type=Rapid+diagnost....
-
- Krüger LJ, Gaeddert M, Köppel L, Brümmer LE, Gottschalk C, Miranda IB, et al.. Evaluation of the accuracy, ease of use and limit of detection of novel, rapid, antigen-detecting point-of-care diagnostics for SARS-CoV-2. medRxiv. 2020:2020.
-
- World Health Organisation. WHO Emergency Use Listing for In vitro diagnostics (IVDs) Detecting SARS-CoV-2. 2020.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous