Developing an applied model for making decisions towards the end of life about care for someone with dementia
- PMID: 34043728
- PMCID: PMC8158904
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252464
Developing an applied model for making decisions towards the end of life about care for someone with dementia
Abstract
Background: Many people with dementia reach the end-of-life without an advance care plan. Many are not ready to have conversations about end-of-life, and decision-making is left to their families and professionals when they no longer have capacity. Carers may benefit from further support with decision-making. To develop this support, it is important to understand the decision-making process.
Aim: Explore with family carers and people living with dementia the decision-making process and factors that influence decision-making in dementia end of life care, to produce a model of decision-making in the context of dementia end-of-life care.
Methods: Semi-structured interviews with 21 family carers and 11 people with dementia in England (2018-2019) from memory clinics, general practice and carer organisations. Interviews were analysed using thematic analysis and findings were mapped onto the Interprofessional Shared Decision Making model, refined to produce a modified model of decision-making in dementia.
Results: Participants described five key decisions towards the end-of-life as examples of decision making. We used these experiences to produce a modified model of decision-making in dementia end-of-life-care. The model considers the contextual factors that influence the decision-making process, including: personal preferences; advance care planning and Lasting Power of Attorney; capacity and health and wellbeing of the person with dementia; support from others and clarity of roles. The decision-making process consists of seven inter-linked stages: 1) identifying the decision maker or team; 2) sharing and exchanging information; 3) clarifying values and preferences; 4) managing and considering emotions; 5) considering the feasibility of options; 6) balancing preferred choice and the actual choice; and 7) implementation and reflecting on outcomes.
Conclusions: The modified model breaks down the decision-making process and attempts to simplify the process while capturing the subtle nuances of decision making. It provides a framework for conversations and supporting decisions by carers.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
References
-
- Department of Health. Mental Capacity Act. London: Stationary Office; 2005.
-
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Dementia: assessment, management and support for people living with dementia and their carers 2018 [Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng97/resources/dementia-assessment-mana.... - PubMed
-
- van der Steen, Radbruch L, Hertogh CM, de Boer ME, Hughes JC, Larkin P, et al.. White paper defining optimal palliative care in older people with dementia: A Delphi study and recommendations from the European Association for Palliative Care. Palliative medicine. 2014;28(3):197–209. 10.1177/0269216313493685 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical