Cigarette brand-switching: effects on smoke exposure and smoking behavior
- PMID: 3404450
Cigarette brand-switching: effects on smoke exposure and smoking behavior
Abstract
This study examined the effects of cigarette yield (Federal Trade Commission-determined deliveries of nicotine, tar and CO) on both biological exposure to smoke constituents and smoking behaviors. Smokers (N = 10) of high-yield cigarettes were switched in random order among five different commercially available cigarette brands with nicotine yields of 0.1, 0.4, 0.7, 1.1 (altered brand) and 1.0 (usual brand) mg and smoked each cigarette type for 5 days while a wide variety of assessments were performed. Steady-state cotinine and CO levels were substantially lower after 5 days of smoking ultra-low yield cigarettes (cotinine, 152 ng/ml; CO, 25 ppm) than when smoking usual-brand high-yield cigarettes (cotinine, 252 ng/ml; CO, 38 ppm). Both CO and nicotine boost (acute exposure) were related to yield. However, relative between-yield differences in all nicotine and CO exposure measures were smaller than predicted from Federal Trade Commission yield ratings. Substantial yield-related alterations were observed in smoking behavior. Subjects smoked more cigarettes and took larger and more closely spaced puffs when smoking low- as compared with high-yield cigarettes. The amount of tobacco burned per day was similar across all yield conditions. However, filter vent-blocking of ultra-low yield cigarettes did not appear to occur on a consistent basis. Subjective reports indicated poor acceptability of lower-yield cigarettes. We conclude that switching to lower-yield cigarettes brings about substantial alterations in smoking behavior which are at least partially responsible for the observed biological compensation associated with these cigarettes.
Similar articles
-
Smoking topography, brand switching, and nicotine delivery: results from an in vivo study.Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005 Jun;14(6):1370-5. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-04-0498. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005. PMID: 15941943
-
Effects of low nicotine content cigarettes on smoke intake.Nicotine Tob Res. 2004 Apr;6(2):309-19. doi: 10.1080/14622200410001676378. Nicotine Tob Res. 2004. PMID: 15203805
-
Higher nicotine and carbon monoxide levels in menthol cigarette smokers with and without schizophrenia.Nicotine Tob Res. 2007 Aug;9(8):873-81. doi: 10.1080/14622200701484995. Nicotine Tob Res. 2007. PMID: 17654300
-
Smoking behaviour and compensation: a review of the literature.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1999 Jul;145(1):1-20. doi: 10.1007/s002130051027. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1999. PMID: 10445368 Review.
-
[Markers for smoking].Pathol Biol (Paris). 1992 Dec;40(10):1015-21. Pathol Biol (Paris). 1992. PMID: 1299808 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Sharing the blame: smoking experimentation and future smoking-attributable mortality due to Joe Camel and Marlboro advertising and promotions.Tob Control. 1999 Spring;8(1):37-44. doi: 10.1136/tc.8.1.37. Tob Control. 1999. PMID: 10465814 Free PMC article.
-
Health impact of "reduced yield" cigarettes: a critical assessment of the epidemiological evidence.Tob Control. 2001;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i4-11. doi: 10.1136/tc.10.suppl_1.i4. Tob Control. 2001. PMID: 11740038 Free PMC article.
-
Beliefs about "Light" and "Ultra Light" cigarettes and efforts to change those beliefs: an overview of early efforts and published research.Tob Control. 2001;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i12-6. doi: 10.1136/tc.10.suppl_1.i12. Tob Control. 2001. PMID: 11740039 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Maternal smoking during pregnancy and severe antisocial behavior in offspring: a review.Am J Public Health. 2002 Jun;92(6):966-74. doi: 10.2105/ajph.92.6.966. Am J Public Health. 2002. PMID: 12036791 Free PMC article.
-
Answering questions about electronic cigarettes using a multidisciplinary model.Am Psychol. 2019 Apr;74(3):368-379. doi: 10.1037/amp0000426. Am Psychol. 2019. PMID: 30945898 Free PMC article.