Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 27;21(1):626.
doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08360-z.

A glycolysis-based three-gene signature predicts survival in patients with lung squamous cell carcinoma

Affiliations

A glycolysis-based three-gene signature predicts survival in patients with lung squamous cell carcinoma

Guichuan Huang et al. BMC Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: Lung cancer is one of the most lethal and most prevalent malignant tumors worldwide, and lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) is one of the major histological subtypes. Although numerous biomarkers have been found to be associated with prognosis in LUSC, the prediction effect of a single gene biomarker is insufficient, especially for glycolysis-related genes. Therefore, we aimed to develop a novel glycolysis-related gene signature to predict survival in patients with LUSC.

Methods: The mRNA expression files and LUSC clinical information were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset.

Results: Based on Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA), we found 5 glycolysis-related gene sets that were significantly enriched in LUSC tissues. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional regression models were performed to choose prognostic-related gene signatures. Based on a Cox proportional regression model, a risk score for a three-gene signature (HKDC1, ALDH7A1, and MDH1) was established to divide patients into high-risk and low-risk subgroups. Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that the risk score for this three-gene signature can be used as an independent prognostic indicator in LUSC. Additionally, based on the cBioPortal database, the rate of genomic alterations in the HKDC1, ALDH7A1, and MDH1 genes were 1.9, 1.1, and 5% in LUSC patients, respectively.

Conclusion: A glycolysis-based three-gene signature could serve as a novel biomarker in predicting the prognosis of patients with LUSC and it also provides additional gene targets that can be used to cure LUSC patients.

Keywords: Gene signature; Glycolysis; Lung cancer; Prognosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The flow chart of study
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
GSEA results for enrichment plots of five gene sets which were significantly differentiated between in LUSC and normal tissues. A, BIOCARTA_GLYCOLYSIS_ PATHWAY; B, GO_GLYCOLYTIC_PROCESS; C, HALLMARK_GLYCOLYSIS; D, KEGG_GLYCOLYSIS_GLUCONEOGENESIS; E, REACTOME_ GLYCOLYSIS. Abbreviations: GSEA, gene set enrichment analysis; LUSC, lung squamous cell carcinoma
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Differential expression of three genes in the normal tissues (n = 49) and tumor tissues (n = 501). (* p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001). A, ALDH7A1; B, HKDC1; C, MDH1
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
A risk of three-gene signature predicted the overall survival in patients with LUSC. A, Distribution of risk score per patient; B, Survival status of each patients; C, A heatmap of three genes expression profile; D, Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis for LUSC patients divided into the high-risk and low-risk groups. Abbreviation: LUSC, lung squamous cell carcinoma
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
The time-independent ROC curve of the risk score for prediction the 1, 3, 5-year overall survival
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Validation for prognostic value of the risk score in different subgroups. A, Subgroup for age ≤ 65; B Subgroup for age > 65; C, Subgroup for Female; D Subgroup for Male; E, Subgroup for AJCC stage I-II; F, Subgroup for AJCC stage III-IV; G, Subgroup for T1 + T2; H, Subgroup for T3 + T4; I, Subgroup for M0; J, Subgroup for M1; K, Subgroup for N0; L, Subgroup for N1 + N2 + N3. Abbreviation: AJCC stage, American Joint Committee on Cancer stage

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Osmani L, Askin F, Gabrielson E, Li QK. Current WHO guidelines and the critical role of immunohistochemical markers in the subclassification of non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC): moving from targeted therapy to immunotherapy. Semin Cancer Biol. 2018;52(Pt 1):103–109. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2017.11.019. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Molinier O, Goupil F, Debieuvre D, Auliac JB, Jeandeau S, Lacroix S, Martin F, Grivaux M. Five-year survival and prognostic factors according to histology in 6101 non-small-cell lung cancer patients. Respir Med Res. 2019;77:46–54. - PubMed
    1. Pirker R. What is the best strategy for targeting EGF receptors in non-small-cell lung cancer? Future Oncol. 2015;11(1):153–167. doi: 10.2217/fon.14.178. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69(1):7–34. doi: 10.3322/caac.21551. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144(5):646–674. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms