Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 27;21(1):1001.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11074-3.

Feasibility and acceptability of "active" classroom workstations among French university students and lecturers: a pilot study

Sidney Grosprêtre  1   2 , Gael Ennequin  3 , Sophie Peseux  4 , Laurie Isacco  3   5
Affiliations

Feasibility and acceptability of "active" classroom workstations among French university students and lecturers: a pilot study

Sidney Grosprêtre et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Sedentary lifestyles plague today's society in terms of physical, psychosocial and cognitive health. Students are particularly at risk because they spend most of their daily time sitting and inactive. The current pedagogical model must be rethought in order to promote students' health, well-being and therefore their success. The objective of this project was to equip one classroom of the sport science department at a university with various active workstations (standing desks, Swiss balls, cycling desks, pedal- or stepper-board) and to evaluate the feasibility and influence of these types of active workstations on the cognitive and psychological factors of the students, and to collect the feedback of lecturers during this experience.

Methods: Participation in the study was voluntary and students had the opportunity to choose or not to use an active workstation during lectures. A total of 663 students and 14 lecturers completed a survey to evaluate subjective feelings about physical, psycho-cognitive and academic aspects after their first experience with active workstations in the classroom.

Results: The majority of students and lecturers reported positive effects of active workstations in reducing fatigue, distraction, and boredom. The preferred active workstations were the cycling desks and the Swiss balls. Finally, 89.4% of students favoured using active workstations in future lectures if they had the option, as well as 71% of lecturers, demonstrating the acceptance of such active workstations.

Conclusion: The present study brings promising results toward a more general implementation of active workstations in universities. Once a familiarisation period is observed, having such workstations in the classroom could help prevent the deleterious effect of sedentary behaviour and promote a more active daily life for the future.

Keywords: Classroom; College; Cycling desk; Sedentary lifestyle; Standing desk.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The four stations tested. A standing desk. B Swiss ball. C cycling-desks. D pedal- or stepper-board
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Graphic representation of student survey results regarding the acceptability and subjective markers of active workstations. n = 663. A perceived time spent active during the 2 h lecture. B Number of students per active workstation spontaneously chosen. C results of the survey regarding the different physical, psychosocial, and academic aspects investigated. Results are percentages
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Effect of the different workstations on discomfort, pain and perceived fatigue. Each graph indicates the percentage of students who reported either a decrease (grey areas), similar (orange) or an increase (blue) in discomfort and pain and fatigue, over the total number of students who used each active workstation
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. WHO. Préambule à la Constitution de l’Organisation mondiale de la Santé, tel qu’adopté par la Conférence internationale sur la Santé, New York, 19 juin −22 juillet 1946; signé le 22 juillet 1946 par les représentants de 61 Etats. (Actes officiels de l’Organisa. in (1946).
    1. Deforche B, Van Dyck D, Deliens T, De Bourdeaudhuij I. Changes in weight, physical activity, sedentary behaviour and dietary intake during the transition to higher education: a prospective study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015;12(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12966-015-0173-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pate RR, O’Neill JR, Lobelo F. The evolving definition of ‘sedentary’. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2008;36(4):173–178. doi: 10.1097/JES.0b013e3181877d1a. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Henson J, Dunstan DW, Davies MJ, Yates T. Sedentary behaviour as a new behavioural target in the prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2016;32(Suppl 1):213–220. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.2759. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Young DR, Hivert MF, Alhassan S, Camhi SM, Ferguson JF, Katzmarzyk PT, Lewis CE, Owen N, Perry CK, Siddique J, Yong CM, Physical Activity Committee of the Council on Lifestyle and Cardiometabolic Health; Council on Clinical Cardiology; Council on Epidemiology and Prevention; Council on Functional Genomics and Translational Biology; and Stroke Council Sedentary behavior and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality: a science advisory from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2016;134(13):e262–e279. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000440. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources