Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 27;11(5):e042212.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042212.

Understanding the influence of socioeconomic status on the association between combinations of lifestyle factors and adverse health outcomes: a systematic review protocol

Affiliations

Understanding the influence of socioeconomic status on the association between combinations of lifestyle factors and adverse health outcomes: a systematic review protocol

Hamish Foster et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Combinations of unhealthy lifestyle factors are strongly associated with mortality, cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cancer. It is unclear how socioeconomic status (SES) affects those associations. Lower SES groups may be disproportionately vulnerable to the effects of unhealthy lifestyle factors compared with higher SES groups via interactions with other factors associated with low SES (eg, stress) or via accelerated biological ageing. This systematic review aims to synthesise studies that examine how SES moderates the association between lifestyle factor combinations and adverse health outcomes. Greater understanding of how lifestyle risk varies across socioeconomic spectra could reduce adverse health by (1) identifying novel high-risk groups or targets for future interventions and (2) informing research, policy and interventions that aim to support healthy lifestyles in socioeconomically deprived communities.

Methods and analysis: Three databases will be searched (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL) from inception to March 2020. Reference lists, citations and grey literature will also be searched. Inclusion criteria are: (1) prospective cohort studies; (2) investigations of two key exposures: (a) lifestyle factor combinations of at least three lifestyle factors (eg, smoking, physical activity and diet) and (b) SES (eg, income, education or poverty index); (3) an assessment of the impact of SES on the association between combinations of unhealthy lifestyle factors and health outcomes; (4) at least one outcome from-mortality (all cause, CVD and cancer), CVD or cancer incidence. Two independent reviewers will screen titles, abstracts and full texts of included studies. Data extraction will focus on cohort characteristics, exposures, direction and magnitude of SES effects, methods and quality (via Newcastle-Ottawa Scale). If appropriate, a meta-analysis, pooling the effects of SES, will be performed. Alternatively, a synthesis without meta-analysis will be conducted.

Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval is not required. Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publication, professional networks, social media and conference presentations.

Prospero registration number: CRD42020172588.

Keywords: epidemiology; preventive medicine; public health; social medicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. GBD 2017 Risk Factor Collaborators . Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2017. Lancet 2018;392:1923–94. 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32225-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Meader N, King K, Moe-Byrne T, et al. . A systematic review on the clustering and co-occurrence of multiple risk behaviours. BMC Public Health 2016;16:657. 10.1186/s12889-016-3373-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Laine JE, Baltar VT, Stringhini S, et al. . Reducing socio-economic inequalities in all-cause mortality: a counterfactual mediation approach. Int J Epidemiol 2020;49:497–510. 10.1093/ije/dyz248 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marmot MG, Shipley MJ, Hemingway H, et al. . Biological and behavioural explanations of social inequalities in coronary heart disease: the Whitehall II study. Diabetologia 2008;51:1980–8. 10.1007/s00125-008-1144-3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Loef M, Walach H. The combined effects of healthy lifestyle behaviors on all cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prev Med 2012;55:163–70. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.06.017 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources