Understanding the influence of socioeconomic status on the association between combinations of lifestyle factors and adverse health outcomes: a systematic review protocol
- PMID: 34045211
- PMCID: PMC8162079
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042212
Understanding the influence of socioeconomic status on the association between combinations of lifestyle factors and adverse health outcomes: a systematic review protocol
Abstract
Introduction: Combinations of unhealthy lifestyle factors are strongly associated with mortality, cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cancer. It is unclear how socioeconomic status (SES) affects those associations. Lower SES groups may be disproportionately vulnerable to the effects of unhealthy lifestyle factors compared with higher SES groups via interactions with other factors associated with low SES (eg, stress) or via accelerated biological ageing. This systematic review aims to synthesise studies that examine how SES moderates the association between lifestyle factor combinations and adverse health outcomes. Greater understanding of how lifestyle risk varies across socioeconomic spectra could reduce adverse health by (1) identifying novel high-risk groups or targets for future interventions and (2) informing research, policy and interventions that aim to support healthy lifestyles in socioeconomically deprived communities.
Methods and analysis: Three databases will be searched (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL) from inception to March 2020. Reference lists, citations and grey literature will also be searched. Inclusion criteria are: (1) prospective cohort studies; (2) investigations of two key exposures: (a) lifestyle factor combinations of at least three lifestyle factors (eg, smoking, physical activity and diet) and (b) SES (eg, income, education or poverty index); (3) an assessment of the impact of SES on the association between combinations of unhealthy lifestyle factors and health outcomes; (4) at least one outcome from-mortality (all cause, CVD and cancer), CVD or cancer incidence. Two independent reviewers will screen titles, abstracts and full texts of included studies. Data extraction will focus on cohort characteristics, exposures, direction and magnitude of SES effects, methods and quality (via Newcastle-Ottawa Scale). If appropriate, a meta-analysis, pooling the effects of SES, will be performed. Alternatively, a synthesis without meta-analysis will be conducted.
Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval is not required. Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publication, professional networks, social media and conference presentations.
Prospero registration number: CRD42020172588.
Keywords: epidemiology; preventive medicine; public health; social medicine.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Similar articles
-
The influence of socioeconomic status on the association between unhealthy lifestyle factors and adverse health outcomes: a systematic review.Wellcome Open Res. 2023 Dec 8;8:55. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.18708.2. eCollection 2023. Wellcome Open Res. 2023. PMID: 38533439 Free PMC article.
-
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36321557 Free PMC article.
-
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881. Med J Aust. 2020. PMID: 33314144
-
Associations of healthy lifestyle and socioeconomic status with mortality and incident cardiovascular disease: two prospective cohort studies.BMJ. 2021 Apr 14;373:n604. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n604. BMJ. 2021. PMID: 33853828 Free PMC article.
-
The association between socioeconomic status and pandemic influenza: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 4;8(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0931-2. Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 30609940 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
The influencing factors of health-related quality of life among rural hypertensive individuals: a cross-sectional study.Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Oct 18;19(1):244. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01879-6. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021. PMID: 34663349 Free PMC article.
-
Bioimpedance assessment of body composition in the first adulthood period of somatic types residing in highland.J Electr Bioimpedance. 2024 Oct 5;15(1):125-129. doi: 10.2478/joeb-2024-0014. eCollection 2024 Jan. J Electr Bioimpedance. 2024. PMID: 39371332 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Seven Healthy Lifestyle Scores Cardiometabolic Health: Age, Sex, and Lifestyle Interactions in the NutrIMDEA Web-Based Study.J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2023 Dec;13(4):653-663. doi: 10.1007/s44197-023-00140-1. Epub 2023 Aug 27. J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2023. PMID: 37634195 Free PMC article.
-
Dietary caffeine and its negative link to serum Klotho concentrations: evidence from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.Front Nutr. 2024 Dec 11;11:1497224. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1497224. eCollection 2024. Front Nutr. 2024. PMID: 39723163 Free PMC article.
-
Urbanization, socioeconomic status, and exposure to PM2.5, associated with township-based cerebrovascular disease (CBD) mortality.PLoS One. 2025 Jun 6;20(6):e0324070. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324070. eCollection 2025. PLoS One. 2025. PMID: 40478795 Free PMC article.
References
-
- GBD 2017 Risk Factor Collaborators . Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2017. Lancet 2018;392:1923–94. 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32225-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources