Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 27;11(1):11173.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-90432-y.

Pt and CoB trilayer Josephson [Formula: see text] junctions with perpendicular magnetic anisotropy

Affiliations

Pt and CoB trilayer Josephson [Formula: see text] junctions with perpendicular magnetic anisotropy

N Satchell et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

We report on the electrical transport properties of Nb based Josephson junctions with Pt/Co[Formula: see text]B[Formula: see text]/Pt ferromagnetic barriers. The barriers exhibit perpendicular magnetic anisotropy, which has the main advantage for potential applications over magnetisation in-plane systems of not affecting the Fraunhofer response of the junction. In addition, we report that there is no magnetic dead layer at the Pt/Co[Formula: see text]B[Formula: see text] interfaces, allowing us to study barriers with ultra-thin Co[Formula: see text]B[Formula: see text]. In the junctions, we observe that the magnitude of the critical current oscillates with increasing thickness of the Co[Formula: see text]B[Formula: see text] strong ferromagnetic alloy layer. The oscillations are attributed to the ground state phase difference across the junctions being modified from zero to [Formula: see text]. The multiple oscillations in the thickness range [Formula: see text] nm suggests that we have access to the first zero-[Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]-zero phase transitions. Our results fuel the development of low-temperature memory devices based on ferromagnetic Josephson junctions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Magnetic characterisation of the sheet film samples S-Pt(10)-Co68B32(dCoB)-Pt(5)-S. (a,b) Magnetic hysteresis loops of the magnetic moment (m) per area acquired at a temperature of 10 K with the applied field oriented out-of-plane for (a) dCoB=0.6 nm and (b) dCoB=1.4 nm. The diamagnetic contribution from the substrate has been subtracted. (c) Collated saturation moment per area versus nominal thickness of Co68B32. To model the lower m/area of the thinnest samples in the study, we construct a partial layer coverage model detailed in the text and shown in the inset. The result of fitting the model over the entire data range is shown by the solid line. The extracted magnetisation M=760±90 emu/cm3. The dashed line shows an extrapolation of the linear part of the model to the intercepts. Values of m/area are calculated from the measured total magnetic moments and areas of the samples. The uncertainty in each point is dominated by the area measurements, and is less than 5%.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a) Schematic cross section of the S-F-S Josephson junction device (not to scale). The thickness of each layer is given in nanometers. The Co68B32 layer thickness, dCoB, is ranged from 0.2 to 1.4 nm. (b) Product of critical Josephson current times normal-state resistance versus applied magnetic field for the device depicted in (a) with dCoB=0.6 nm at 1.8 K. Ic is determined from the measured IV characteristic at each field value and RN is the average normal state resistance across all measured fields. The uncertainty in determining IcRN is smaller than the data points. The data are fit with Eqs. (2) and (3). Inset: The IV characteristic at zero applied field with fit to Eq. (1).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Top: Product of critical Josephson current times normal-state resistance versus nominal Co68B32 thickness for ferromagnetic Josephson junctions of the form S-Pt(10)-Co68B32(dCoB)-Pt(5)-S at 1.8 K. Each data point represents one Josephson junction and the uncertainty in determining IcRN is smaller than the data points. The data are fit to Eqs. (4) and (5). The best fit parameters for Eq. (4) corresponds to ξF=0.28±0.01 nm, and for Eq. (5) to ξF1=0.28±0.02 nm and ξF2=0.20±0.02 nm. The first minimum at 0.30±0.05 nm indicates a transition between the zero and π-phase states. Bottom: Product of the area times normal-state resistance for the same junctions. The scatter in ARN is most likely sample-to-sample variation in A.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Buzdin AI. Proximity effects in superconductor-ferromagnet heterostructures. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2005;77:935–976. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.77.935. - DOI
    1. Bergeret FS, Volkov AF, Efetov KB. Odd triplet superconductivity and related phenomena in superconductor-ferromagnet structures. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2005;77:1321–1373. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.77.1321. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Eschrig M. Spin-polarized supercurrents for spintronics. Phys. Today. 2011;64:43–49. doi: 10.1063/1.3541944. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Linder J, Robinson JWA. Superconducting spintronics. Nat. Phys. 2015;11:307–315. doi: 10.1038/nphys3242. - DOI
    1. Eschrig M. Spin-polarized supercurrents for spintronics: a review of current progress. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2015;78:104501. doi: 10.1088/0034-4885/78/10/104501. - DOI - PubMed