Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 11:12:669934.
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.669934. eCollection 2021.

Benchmarking the Extent and Speed of Reperfusion: First Pass TICI 2c-3 Is a Preferred Endovascular Reperfusion Endpoint

Affiliations

Benchmarking the Extent and Speed of Reperfusion: First Pass TICI 2c-3 Is a Preferred Endovascular Reperfusion Endpoint

Albert J Yoo et al. Front Neurol. .

Abstract

Background and Purpose: End-of-procedure substantial reperfusion [modified Treatment in Cerebral Ischemia (mTICI) 2b-3], the leading endpoint for thrombectomy studies, has several limitations including a ceiling effect, with recent achieved rates of ~90%. We aimed to identify a more optimal definition of angiographic success along two dimensions: (1) the extent of tissue reperfusion, and (2) the speed of revascularization. Methods: Core-lab adjudicated TICI scores for the first three passes of EmboTrap and the final all-procedures result were analyzed in the ARISE II multicenter study. The clinical impact of extent of reperfusion and speed of reperfusion (first-pass vs. later-pass) were evaluated. Clinical outcomes included 90-day functional independence [modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-2], 90-day freedom-from-disability (mRS 0-1), and dramatic early improvement [24-h National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) improvement ≥ 8 points]. Results: Among 161 ARISE II subjects with ICA or MCA M1 occlusions, reperfusion results at procedure end showed substantial reperfusion in 149 (92.5%), excellent reperfusion in 121 (75.2%), and complete reperfusion in 79 (49.1%). Reperfusion rates on first pass were substantial in 81 (50.3%), excellent reperfusion in 62 (38.5%), and complete reperfusion in 44 (27.3%). First-pass excellent reperfusion (first-pass TICI 2c-3) had the greatest nominal predictive value for 90-day mRS 0-2 (sensitivity 58.5%, specificity 68.6%). There was a progressive worsening of outcomes with each additional pass required to achieve TICI 2c-3. Conclusions: First-pass excellent reperfusion (TICI 2c-3), reflecting rapid achievement of extensive reperfusion, is the technical revascularization endpoint that best predicted functional independence in this international multicenter trial and is an attractive candidate for a lead angiographic endpoint for future trials. Clinical Trial Registration: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT02488915.

Keywords: brain ischaemia; cerebral infacrction; intra-arterial therapy; mechanical thrombectomy; reperfusion; reperfusion grading; stent retriever.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

AY is a consultant for Cerenovus, Penumbra, and Zoll, receives research grants from Medtronic, Cerenovus, Penumbra, Stryker, and Genentech, and has equity interest in Insera Therapeutics. TA is a consultant for Neuravi, Ablynx, Amnis Therapeutics, Medtronic, Rapid Medical, and Stryker. The University of California, Regents receives funding for JSa's services as a scientific consultant regarding trial design and conduct for Covidien and Stryker; JSa is an employee of the University of California, which holds a patent on retriever devices for stroke. MR is a shareholder in Anaconda Biomed, consultant for Cerenovus, Medtronic, Stryker, Apta Targets, and Vesalio. HB serves as a modest consultant for Cerenovus/Neuravi, and Stryker. GD serves as a consultant for Medtronic, Microvention, Penumbra, and Cerenovus. DL serves as an imaging core lab consultant for Cerenovus, Genentech, Medtronic, Stryker, and Vesalio. HM reports personal fees from Covidien/Medtronic, Neuravi/Cerenovus, Servier, and Bayer outside the submitted work, and served on the steering committees of the SWIFT PRIME and ARISE studies. OZ serves as a consultant for Neuravi, Stryker, Penumbra, and Medtronic. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Distribution of 90-day mRS scores comparing first-pass reperfusion vs. multiple-pass reperfusion. Results are shown for (A) final TICI 2b: median 90-day mRS scores were 1 (IQR 0-3) vs. 3 (IQR 2–4) for the first-pass group vs. the multiple-pass group (P = 0.04); (B) final TICI 2c: median 90-day mRS scores were 0 (IQR 0–2) vs. 2 (IQR 1–4) for the first-pass group vs. the multiple-pass group (P = 0.004); and (C) final TICI 3 patients: median 90-day mRS scores were 1 (IQR 0–2) vs. 2 (IQR 1–5) for the first-pass group vs. the multiple-pass group (P = 0.01).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Box-whisker plots showing median 90-day mRS vs. final TICI grade. There are significantly lower mRS scores with greater final reperfusion (P < 0.05; Jonckheere-Terpstra trend test).
Figure 3
Figure 3
90-day outcomes vs. the number of passes required to reach final TICI 2c-3 reperfusion. (A) 90-day mRS: There are significantly lower mRS scores with fewer passes (P = 0.0001; Jonckheere-Terpstra trend test). (B) 90-day mRS 0–2: There are progressively lower rates of good outcome with increasing number of passes (P = 0.005; Chi-squared test for trend). Asterisk indicates significant difference compared to non-reperfusers (final TICI 0-2a). (C) 90-day mRS 0–1: There are progressively lower rates of excellent outcome with increasing number of passes (P = 0.003; Chi-squared test for trend). Asterisk indicates significant difference compared to non-reperfusers (final TICI 0-2a).

References

    1. Zaidat OO, Yoo AJ, Khatri P, Tomsick TA, von Kummer R, Saver JL, et al. . Recommendations on angiographic revascularization grading standards for acute ischemic stroke: a consensus statement. Stroke. (2013) 44:2650–63. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001972 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yoo AJ, Simonsen CZ, Prabhakaran S, Chaudhry ZA, Issa MA, Fugate JE, et al. . Refining angiographic biomarkers of revascularization: improving outcome prediction after intra-arterial therapy. Stroke. (2013) 44:2509–12. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001990 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berkhemer OA, Fransen PS, Beumer D, van den Berg LA, Lingsma HF, Yoo AJ, et al. . A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. (2015) 372:11–20. 10.1056/NEJMoa1411587 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Goyal M, Menon BK, van Zwam WH, Dippel DW, Mitchell PJ, Demchuk AM, et al. . Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials. Lancet. (2016) 387:1723–31. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00163-X - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yoo AJ, Andersson T. Thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke: challenges to procedural success. J Stroke. (2017) 19:121–30. 10.5853/jos.2017.00752 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Associated data