Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 24;9(5):e3527.
doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003527. eCollection 2021 May.

Self-development Tools Utilized by Plastic Surgeons: A Survey of ASPS Members

Santiago R Gonzalez  1 , Brian J Blumenauer  2 , James C Yuen  3 , Michael S Golinko  2
Affiliations

Self-development Tools Utilized by Plastic Surgeons: A Survey of ASPS Members

Santiago R Gonzalez et al. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. .

Abstract

The plastic surgery literature is devoid of research on the topic of professional development tools that may be used to enhance performance as a plastic surgeon. After an extensive review of the medical literature, we selected the most frequently referenced professional development tools utilized by plastic surgeons, which included the following: goal setting, positive visualization, scheduled practice, critically analyzing mistakes, professional development conferences, involvement in sports, motivational videos, podcasts & audiobooks, daily morning routines, self-development books, and advice from mentors.

Methods: A 10-question survey was sent to 2542 members of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS). The algorithm used to select ASPS members to survey was based on member demographics that would best reflect the views of the entire active society membership. Responses were compared based on demographic factors such as type of practice, gender, and age.

Results: A total of 286/2542 (11.25%) ASPS members participated in the survey. Analyzing mistakes (96.3%), goal setting (88.51%), and advice from mentors (85.2%) were most commonly attributed to self-development. Respondents in an academic practice favored conferences and advice from mentors. Participants in a solo practice favored self-help books and morning routines. No statistical differences were observed based on training background.

Conclusions: ASPS members attribute their professional development to setting measurable goals, carefully analyzing surgical mistakes, and guidance from mentors. This information opens the door for continued analysis of professional development within plastic surgery as well as supplement training practices at the resident and post-graduate level.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
The survey responses for whether or not survey participants used specific self-development tools. Answer choices are portrayed in the figure as either yes or no.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Weighted average responses for all survey participants.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Weighted average comparisons based on gender.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Weighted average comparisons based on age groups.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
Weighted average comparisons based on practice types.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Drosdeck JM, Osayi SN, Peterson LA, et al. . Surgeon and nonsurgeon personalities at different career points. J Surg Res. 2015; 196:60–66. - PubMed
    1. Hoffman BM, Coons MJ, Kuo PC. Personality differences between surgery residents, nonsurgery residents, and medical students. Surgery. 2010; 148:187–193. - PubMed
    1. Preece RA, Cope AC. Are surgeons born or made? A comparison of personality traits and learning styles between surgical trainees and medical students. J Surg Educ. 2016; 73:768–773. - PubMed
    1. Warschkow R, Steffen T, Spillmann M, et al. . A comparative cross-sectional study of personality traits in internists and surgeons. Surgery. 2010; 148:901–907. - PubMed
    1. Yeo H, Viola K, Berg D, et al. . Attitudes, training experiences, and professional expectations of US general surgery residents: a national survey. JAMA. 2009; 302:1301–1308. - PubMed