Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun 17;9(6):e28708.
doi: 10.2196/28708.

Telerehabilitation for Lung Transplant Candidates and Recipients During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Program Evaluation

Affiliations

Telerehabilitation for Lung Transplant Candidates and Recipients During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Program Evaluation

Lisa Wickerson et al. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. .

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a rapid shift from center-based rehabilitation to telerehabilitation for chronic respiratory disease and lung transplantation due to infection control precautions. Clinical experience with this delivery model on a large scale has not been described.

Objective: The aim of this study is to describe usage and satisfaction of providers and lung transplant (LTx) candidates and recipients and functional outcomes following the broad implementation of telerehabilitation with remote patient monitoring during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: This study was a program evaluation of providers, LTx candidates, and early LTx recipients who used a web-based, remote monitoring app for at least four weeks between March 16 and September 1, 2020, to participate in telerehabilitation. Within-subjects analysis was performed for physical activity, Self-efficacy For Exercise (SEE) scale score, aerobic and resistance exercise volumes, 6-minute walk test results, and Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) results.

Results: In total, 78 LTx candidates and 33 recipients were included (57 [51%] males, mean age 58 [SD 12] years, 58 [52%] with interstitial lung disease, 34 [31%] with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease). A total of 50 (64%) LTx candidates and 17 (51%) LTx recipients entered ≥10 prescribed exercise sessions into the app during the study time frame. In addition, 35/42 (83%) candidates agreed the app helped prepare them for surgery and 18/21 (85%) recipients found the app helpful in their self-recovery. The strongest barrier perceived by physiotherapists delivering the telerehabilitation was patient access to home exercise and monitoring equipment. Between the time of app registration and ≥4 weeks on the waiting list, 26 LTx candidates used a treadmill, with sessions increasing in mean duration (from 16 to 22 minutes, P=.002) but not speed (from 1.7 to 1.75 mph, P=.31). Quadriceps weight (pounds) for leg extension did not change (median 3.5, IQR 2.4-5 versus median 4.3, IQR 3-5; P=.08; n=37). On the Rapid Assessment of Physical Activity questionnaire (RAPA), 57% of LTx candidates scored as active, which improved to 87% (P=.02; n=23). There was a decrease in pretransplant 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) from 346 (SD 84) meters to 307 (SD 85) meters (P=.002; n=45) and no change in the SPPB result (12 [IQR 9.5-12] versus 12 [IQR 10-12]; P=.90; n=42). A total of 9 LTx recipients used a treadmill that increased in speed (from 1.9 to 2.7 mph; P=.003) between hospital discharge and three months posttransplant. Quadriceps weight increased (3 [IQR 0-3] pounds versus 5 [IQR 3.8-6.5] pounds; P<.001; n=15). At three months posttransplant, 76% of LTx recipients scored as active (n=17), with a high total SEE score of 74 (SD 11; n=12). In addition, three months posttransplant, 6MWD was 62% (SD 18%) predicted (n=8).

Conclusions: We were able to provide telerehabilitation despite challenges around exercise equipment. This early experience will inform the development of a robust and equitable telerehabilitation model beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.

Keywords: COVID-19; app; lung; outcome; rehabilitation; satisfaction; telemedicine; telerehabilitation; transplant; usage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: DR receives financial support from the Sandra Faire and Ivan Fecan Professorship in Rehabilitation Medicine. The other authors have no conflicts to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow and attrition of lung transplant candidates and recipients. aThis time frame would permit at least 4 weeks of rehabilitation data to be entered into the app between March 16, 2020, and September 1, 2020, accounting for 2 weeks of hospitalization posttransplant.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Number of lung transplant candidates who self-reported as being physically active on the Rapid Assessment of Physical Activity scale at baseline after app registration and after four weeks of home exercise (n=23). Scored as participating in 30 minutes or more of moderate intensity activity for 5 or more days per week.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Categories of physical activity using the Rapid Assessment of Physical Activity scale three months posttransplant (n=17). Active: 30 minutes or more of moderate intensity physical activity 5 or more days per week. Underactive: some moderate physical activity but not every week or less than 30 minutes per day. Sedentary: rarely or never do any physical activities.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wickerson L, Mathur S, Singer LG, Brooks D. Physical activity levels early after lung transplantation. Phys Ther. 2015 Apr;95(4):517–25. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20140173. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Langer D, Burtin C, Schepers L, Ivanova A, Verleden G, Decramer M, Troosters T, Gosselink R. Exercise training after lung transplantation improves participation in daily activity: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Transplant. 2012 Jun;12(6):1584–92. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04000.x. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04000.x. - DOI - DOI - PubMed
    1. Walsh JR, Chambers DC, Davis RJ, Morris NR, Seale HE, Yerkovich ST, Hopkins PMA. Impaired exercise capacity after lung transplantation is related to delayed recovery of muscle strength. Clin Transplant. 2013;27(4):E504–11. doi: 10.1111/ctr.12163. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Li M, Mathur S, Chowdhury NA, Helm D, Singer LG. Pulmonary rehabilitation in lung transplant candidates. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2013 Jun;32(6):626–32. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2013.04.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Martinu T, Babyak MA, O'Connell CF, Carney RM, Trulock EP, Davis RD, Blumenthal JA, Palmer SM, INSPIRE Investigators Baseline 6-min walk distance predicts survival in lung transplant candidates. Am J Transplant. 2008 Jul;8(7):1498–505. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2008.02264.x. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2008.02264.x. - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types