Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Aug;24(4):1424-1432.
doi: 10.1111/hex.13281. Epub 2021 May 28.

User involvement in the making: Positions and types of knowledge enacted in the interaction between service users and researchers in user panel meetings

Affiliations

User involvement in the making: Positions and types of knowledge enacted in the interaction between service users and researchers in user panel meetings

Per Koren Solvang et al. Health Expect. 2021 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Numerous studies of user involvement in research have been conducted. However, there is a lack of studies applying observational methods and addressing the concrete practice of involvement.

Objective: To determine what knowledge types and competences users apply when involved in the research process through user panel meetings.

Design: User panel meetings in a qualitative project in rehabilitation were sound-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data analysis applied an abductive approach framed by positioning theory.

Setting and participants: Six rehabilitation service users and a similar number of researchers met 20 times during a six-year project period. They discussed various issues in the research process such as interview guides, analysis and dissemination of results.

Findings: The service users combined their respective knowledge and competence into six positions enacted in the panel interactions. They engaged as co-researchers, based their contributions on their respective personal histories, represented an NGO and peers, applied their respective professional and educational backgrounds and, finally, engaged as concerned citizens.

Discussion and conclusion: The findings add to the discussion of professionalization of user involvement by introducing a wider array of positions enacted than do the findings of previous studies. Researchers recruiting user panel members, as well as NGOs appointing candidates for user panels, are advised to consider a wide competence profile for possible candidates. A panel is also considered as a resource in confirming and elaborating on a study's findings.

Patient and public contribution: A service user panel contributed to the study.

Keywords: health and social care research; panel meetings; patient and public involvement; positioning theory; types of knowledge; user involvement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Green G. Power to the people: to what extent has public involvement in applied health research achieved this? Res Involv Engagem. 2016;2(1):1‐13. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bird M, Ouellette C, Whitmore C, et al. Preparing for patient partnership: a scoping review of patient partner engagement and evaluation in research. Health Expect. 2020;23(3):523‐539. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Harris J, Cook T, Gibbs L, et al. Searching for the impact of participation in health and health research: challenges and methods. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:1‐12. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brett J, Staniszewska S, Mockford C, et al. Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review. Health Expect. 2014;17(5):637‐650. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Domecq JP, Prutsky G, Elraiyah T, et al. Patient engagement in research: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14(1):1‐9. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types