Predictive value of T2-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for assessing cervical invasion in patients with endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis

Abstract

Purpose: To obtain the diagnostic accuracy of T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) in the preoperative assessment of cervical invasion in patients with endometrial cancer (EC).

Methods: Databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Clinical Trials were searched for relevant articles published from January 2000 to August 2020. Pooled estimation data were obtained by statistical analysis.

Results: In total, 24 articles were included. For assessing cervical invasion of EC, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC) for T2WI were 0.70 (0.61-0.77), 0.92 (0.89-0.94), 8.7 (6.5-11.6), 0.33 (0.25-0.43), 26 (17-41), and 0.92 (0.89-0.94), respectively. For DCE-MRI, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, DOR, and AUC were 0.75 (0.60-0.85), 0.95 (0.89-0.98), 14.7 (6.6-32.9), 0.27 (0.16-0.44), 55 (18-165), and 0.92 (0.89-0.94), respectively; for T2WI combined with DCE-MRI, they were 0.58 (0.41-0.73), 0.98 (0.95-0.99), 28.1 (12.8-62.1), 0.43 (0.30-0.63), 65 (29-146), and 0.94 (0.91-0.96), respectively.

Conclusions: DCE-MRI demonstrated higher diagnostic performance than T2WI in the prediction of cervical invasion in patients with EC. T2WI combined with DCE-MRI improved the pooled specificity, PLR, DOR, and AUC compared to T2WI alone or DCE-MRI alone.

Keywords: Cervical invasion; Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI; Endometrial cancer; Meta-analysis; T2-weighted imaging.