Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 1;36(2):74.
doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002191.

Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta in Hemodynamically Unstable Patients With Pelvic Ring Injuries

Lucas S Marchand  1 , Aresh Sepehri  2 , Zachary D Hannan  1 , Raza Zaidi  1 , Joseph J DuBose  1 , Jonathan J Morrison  1 , Robert V O'Toole  1 , Gerard M Slobogean  1
Affiliations

Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta in Hemodynamically Unstable Patients With Pelvic Ring Injuries

Lucas S Marchand et al. J Orthop Trauma. .

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the outcomes of patients with pelvic ring injuries managed with resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA).

Design: Retrospective case series.

Setting: Academic, Level 1 trauma center in North America.

Patients: Twenty-five patients with disruption of the pelvic ring and hemodynamic instability.

Intervention: Placement of a REBOA device as an adjuvant treatment to trauma resuscitation.

Main outcome measure: Death and ischemic-related complications.

Results: The average age of patients was 43 years (range: 17-85). Patients presented with a median lactate of 6.3 mmol/L, systolic blood pressure of 116 mm Hg, heart rate of 121 beats/minute, and injury severity score of 34. The median unit of packed red blood cells received through transfusion in the first 24 hours of hospital admission was 13 (interquartile range: 8-28). Young-Burgess injury patterns included fractures of the following types: 5 lateral compression (LC)-1, 1 LC-2, 8 LC-3, 4 anteroposterior compression-2, and 7 anteroposterior compression-3. Angiography and embolization were performed in 24 (96%) patients. Selective embolization occurred in 18 (72%) patients, with nonselective angiography of the iliac system occurring in 7 (24%) patients. There were 12 (48%) deaths, 7 (28%) patients requiring lower extremity fasciotomy, and 5 (20%) patients requiring lower extremity amputations, and there was 1 (4%) patient requiring thrombectomy.

Conclusions: REBOA use in pelvic ring injuries is rare and most frequently used in critically ill patients with polytrauma. Successful pelvic embolization can occur in concert with REBOA use; however, the severity of injury is associated with a high complication profile. In this series of 25 patients, in-hospital mortality was 48%. For those patients who survived, 54% experienced a major complication (fasciotomy, amputation, and deep infection). Further investigation is required to evaluate the role REBOA may play in managing these patients.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Comment in

References

    1. van Vugt AB, van Kampen A. An unstable pelvic ring. The killing fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:427–433.
    1. Blackmore CC, Jurkovich GJ, Linnau KF, et al. Assessment of volume of hemorrhage and outcome from pelvic fracture. Arch Surg. 2003;138:504–509.
    1. O'Sullivan RE, White TO, Keating JF. Major pelvic fractures: identification of patients at high risk. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:530–533.
    1. Sharma OP, Oswanski MF, Rabbi J, et al. Pelvic fracture risk assessment on admission. Am Surg. 2008;74:761–766.
    1. Chong KH, DeCoster T, Osler T, et al. Pelvic fractures and mortality. Iowa Orthop J. 1997;17:110–114.

LinkOut - more resources