Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Oct 4;61(3):900-916.
doi: 10.1093/icb/icab107.

Perspectives on Individual Animal Identification from Biology and Computer Vision

Affiliations
Review

Perspectives on Individual Animal Identification from Biology and Computer Vision

Maxime Vidal et al. Integr Comp Biol. .

Abstract

Identifying individual animals is crucial for many biological investigations. In response to some of the limitations of current identification methods, new automated computer vision approaches have emerged with strong performance. Here, we review current advances of computer vision identification techniques to provide both computer scientists and biologists with an overview of the available tools and discuss their applications. We conclude by offering recommendations for starting an animal identification project, illustrate current limitations, and propose how they might be addressed in the future.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
(a) Animal biometrics examples featuring unique distinguishable phenotypic traits (adapted with permission from unsplash.com). (b) Three pictures each of three example tigers from the Amur Tiger reID Dataset (Shuyuan et al. 2019) and three pictures each of three example bears from the McNeil River State Game Sanctuary (photo credit Alaska Department of Fish and Game). The tiger stripes are robust visual biometrics. The bear images highlight the variations across seasons (fur and weight changes). Postures and contexts vary more or less depending on the species and dataset and further complicate identification. (c) Machine learning identification pipeline from raw data acquisition through feature extraction to identity retrieval.

References

    1. Alexander L.2012. Identification of great apes using gabor features and locality preserving projections. Proceedings of the 1st ACM international workshop on Multimedia analysis for ecological data. p. 19–24.
    1. Allen WL, Higham JP.. 2015. Assessing the potential information content of multicomponent visual signals: a machine learning approach. Proc Biol Sciences Royal Soc 282:20142284. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Augustine BC, Royle JA, Linden DW, Fuller AK.. 2020. Spatial proximity moderates genotype uncertainty in genetic tagging studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 117:17903–12. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Augustine BC, Royle JA, Murphy SM, Chandler RB, Cox JJ, Kelly MJ.. 2019. Spatial capture–recapture for categorically marked populations with an application to genetic capture–recapture. Ecosphere 10:e02627.
    1. Baetscher DS, Clemento AJ, Ng TC, Anderson EC, Garza JC.. 2018. Microhaplotypes provide increased power from short-read dna sequences for relationship inference. Mol Ecol Resource 18:296–305. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources