Opportunities for Restructuring Hospital Transfer Networks for Pediatric Asthma

Abstract

Objective: To describe the current system of pediatric asthma care and identify potential options for unloading tertiary centers.

Methods: Retrospective, cross-sectional study using 2014 inpatient and emergency department all-encounter administrative datasets from Arkansas, Florida, Kentucky, Maryland, Massachusetts, and New York. Study participants included children <18 with primary diagnosis of asthma.

Results: There were 174,239 encounters for pediatric asthma, with 26,316 admissions and 3101 transfers. About 94.4% of transfers were admitted, with median stay length 2 days (interquartile range [IQR] 1.0-3.0). About 637 hospitals saw pediatric asthma, but 58.7% never admitted these patients. Fifty-four hospitals (8.5%) regularly received transfers; these hospitals were broadly capable pediatric centers (mean pediatric hospital capability indices = 0.82, IQR: 0.64-0.89). Two hundred nine facilities (32.8%) did not regularly receive transfers but were highly capable of caring for pediatric asthma (mean condition-specific capability = 0.92, IQR: 0.85-1.00). Median distance from transferring hospitals to the nearest pediatric center was 25.7 miles (IQR: 6.45-50.15) vs 18.0 miles (IQR: 8.35-29.25) to the nearest potential receiving hospital. Mean cost of a 2-day asthma admission in receiving hospitals was $3927 (IQR: $3083-$4894) versus $3427 (IQR: $2485-$4102) in potential receivers.

Conclusions: While nearly all acute care hospitals encounter children with asthma, more than half never admit them. Children are primarily transferred to a small subset of specialized centers, despite the existence, in many regions, of closer community hospitals with high pediatric asthma capability. In settings with long transfer distances and tertiary center crowding, a tiered system of hospital care for pediatric asthma may be feasible.

Keywords: hospital systems; pediatric asthma.