Comparison of long-term outcome of two endoscopic transtympanic myringoplasty without tympanomeatal flap elevating for repairing large chronic perforations

Abstract

Objective: We compare the long-term efficacy of the cartilage-perichondrium modified over-underlay technique and transtympanic underlay alone technique using endoscopic myringoplasty without tympanomeatal flap elevating for repairing large chronic perforations.

Material and methods: Nine chronic large perforations with mucosal chronic otitis media were recruited and randomly allocated to endoscopic cartilage-perichondrium modified over-underlay myringoplasty (MOUM, n = 55) and endoscopic cartilage-perichondrium transtympanic underlay alone myringoplasty (TUAM, n = 54). The graft success rate, hearing gain, mean operation time and postoperative complications were compared between the groups at 6 and 24 months.

Results: In total, 99 patients were finally analysed. The graft success rates 6 months after surgery between MOUM and TUAM groups were not significantly different (100.0% vs 96.0%, p = 0.484). However, the MOUM group had a significantly higher success rate 24 months after surgery than the TUAM group (93.9% vs 76.0%, p = 0.028). In addition, postoperative ABG < 10 dB was 73.5% patients in the MOUM group and 76.0% in the TUAM group, the difference wasn't significant (p = 0.953). CT examination revealed well-pneumatised middle ears 24 months after surgery in both groups, and no middle ear cholesteatoma was observed.

Conclusion: Endoscopic modified cartilage-perichondrium over-underlay myringoplasty without tympanomeatal flap elevating is reliable and effective for repairing large perforations. It improves the long-term graft success rate compared to the endoscopic cartilage-perichondrium transtympanic underlay alone technique. The risk for iatrogenic cholesteatoma is minimal.

Keywords: Cartilage graft; Double-layer graft; Endoscope; Myringoplasty; Trans-perforation.