Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep;147(9):2547-2553.
doi: 10.1007/s00432-021-03671-x. Epub 2021 May 29.

Why so few Nobel Prizes for cancer researchers? An analysis of Nobel Prize nominations for German physicians with a focus on Ernst von Leyden and Karl Heinrich Bauer

Affiliations

Why so few Nobel Prizes for cancer researchers? An analysis of Nobel Prize nominations for German physicians with a focus on Ernst von Leyden and Karl Heinrich Bauer

Nils Hansson et al. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2021 Sep.

Abstract

Purpose: To date, 11 scientists have received the Nobel Prize for discoveries directly related to cancer research. This article provides an overview of cancer researchers nominated for the Nobel Prize from 1901 to 1960 with a focus on Ernst von Leyden (1832-1910), the founder of this journal, and Karl Heinrich Bauer (1890-1978).

Methods: We collected nominations and evaluations in the archive of the Nobel committee of physiology or medicine in Sweden to identify research trends and to analyse oncology in a Nobel Prize context.

Results: We found a total of 54 nominations citing work on cancer as motivation for 11 candidates based in Germany from 1901 to 1953. In the 1930s, the US became the leading nation of cancer research in a Nobel context with nominees like Harvey Cushing (1869-1939) and George N. Papanicolaou (1883-1962).

Discussion: The will of Alfred Nobel stipulates that Nobel laureates should have "conferred the greatest benefit to mankind". Why were then so few cancer researchers recognized with the Nobel medal from 1901 to 1960? Our analysis of the Nobel dossiers points at multiple reasons: (1) Many of the proposed cancer researchers were surgeons, and surgery has a weak track record in a Nobel context; (2) several scholars were put forward for clinical work and not for basic research (historically, the Nobel committee has favoured basic researchers); (3) the scientists were usually not nominated for a single discovery, but rather for a wide range of different achievements.

Keywords: Ernst von Leyden; Excellence in cancer research; Karl Heinrich Bauer; Leonell Strong; Nobel Prize.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Atzl I, Helms R (2012) Die Gründung des Comités für Krebssammelforschung im Jahr 1900. In: Die Geschichte der Deutschen Krebsgesellschaft. Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft, München
    1. Bartholomew JR (2002) Katsusaburo Yamagiwa’s Nobel candidacy: physiology or medicine in the 1920s. In: Crawford E (ed) Historical Studies in the Nobel Archives. The Prize in Science and Medicine. Universal Academy Press, pp 107–131
    1. Bauer KH (1926) Rassenhygiene. Ihre biologischen Grundlagen. Quelle & Meyer, Leipzig
    1. Bauer KH (1928) Mutationstheorie der Geschwulstentstehung. Übergang von Körperzellen in Geschwulstzellen durch Gen-Änderung. Julius Springer, Berlin
    1. Bauer KH (1943) Die Mutationstheorie der Krebsentstehung im Lichte ihrer chemischen und physikalischen Beweismittel. Münchn Med Wschr 90:681–682

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources