Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct;18(4):783-789.
doi: 10.1007/s10388-021-00846-w. Epub 2021 May 29.

Peri-anastomotic microdialysis lactate assessment after esophagectomy

Affiliations

Peri-anastomotic microdialysis lactate assessment after esophagectomy

Jakob Hedberg et al. Esophagus. 2021 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Esophagectomy is the cornerstone in curative treatment for esophageal and gastroesophageal junctional cancer. Esophageal resection is an advanced procedure with many complications, whereof anastomotic leak is the most dreaded. This study aimed to monitor the microcirculation with microdialysis analysis of local lactate levels in real-time on both sides of the esophagogastric anastomosis in totally minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy.

Materials and methods: Twenty-five patients planned for esophageal resection with gastric conduit reconstruction and intrathoracic anastomosis were recruited. A sampling device, the OnZurf® Probe, along with the CliniSenz® Analyser (Senzime AB, Uppsala Sweden) was utilized for measurements. Lactate levels from both sides of the anastomosis were analysed in real time, on site, by a transportable analyser device. Measurements were made every 30 min during the first 24 h, and thereafter every 2 hours for up to 4 days.

Results: All probes could be positioned as planned and on the third postoperative day 19/25 and 15/25 of the esophageal and gastric probes, respectively, continued to deliver measurements. In total, 89.6% (1539/1718) and 72.4% (1098/1516) of the measurements were deemed successful. The average lactate level on the esophageal side of the anastomosis and the gastric conduit ranged between 1.1-11.5 and 0.8-7.0 mM, respectively. Two anastomotic leaks occurred, one of which had persisting high lactate levels on the gastric side of the anastomosis.

Conclusion: Application and use of the novel CliniSenz® analyser system, in combination with the OnZurf® Probe was feasible and safe. Continuous monitoring of analytes from the perianastomotic area has the potential to improve care after esophageal resection.

Keywords: Anastomotic leak; Esophagus; Microdialysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Placement of the esophageal and gastric probes. Note that the esophageal and gastric probes were fixated under the mediastinal pleura and omental wrap, respectively, and attached to separate analysers
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Lactate levels during the overnight stay at the high dependency unit. Average and standard error of the mean are presented. The orange line represents systemic lactate levels from blood gas analysis at the high dependency unit
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Lactate levels at the surgical ward, i.e., postoperative day 1 to 3, after re-calibration of the system. In the morning of the third postoperative day (here after 48 h), 76% (19/25) and 60% (15/25) of the esophageal and gastric probes, respectively, continued to deliver measurements. Average and standard error of the mean are presented
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Lactate levels in the two patients with anastomotic leakage. In patient #1, a persisting high lactate level was seen in the gastric tube (formula image), visible already during the first postoperative hours. Note the marked increase in lactate in the gastric tube of this patient compared to the remaining measurements illustrated in Figs. 2 and 3

References

    1. Zhang Y. Epidemiology of esophageal cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19(34):5598–5606. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i34.5598. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65(2):87–108. doi: 10.3322/caac.21262. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Global Burden of Disease Cancer, C., C. Fitzmaurice, T.F. Akinyemiju, et al., Global, Regional, and National Cancer Incidence, Mortality, Years of Life Lost, Years Lived With Disability, and Disability-Adjusted Life-Years for 29 Cancer Groups, 1990 to 2016: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. JAMA Oncol, 2018. 4(11): p. 1553–1568. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jeremiasen, M., G. Linder, J. Hedberg, et al., Improvements in esophageal and gastric cancer care in Sweden-population-based results 2007–2016 from a national quality register. Dis Esophagus, 2019. - PMC - PubMed
    1. van Hagen P, Hulshof MC, van Lanschot JJ, et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(22):2074–2084. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1112088. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources