Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun;41(1):55-63.
doi: 10.1142/S1013702521500050. Epub 2021 Jan 18.

The utility of upper limb loading device in determining optimal walking ability in ambulatory individuals with spinal cord injury

Affiliations

The utility of upper limb loading device in determining optimal walking ability in ambulatory individuals with spinal cord injury

Makamas Kumprou et al. Hong Kong Physiother J. 2021 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Walking devices are frequently prescribed for many individuals, including those with spinal cord injury (SCI), to promote their independence. However, without proper screening and follow-up care, the individuals may continue using the same device when their conditions have progressed, that may possibly worsen their walking ability.

Objective: This study developed an upper limb loading device (ULLD), and assessed the possibility of using the tool to determine the optimal walking ability of ambulatory participants with SCI who used a walking device daily ( n = 49 ).

Methods: All participants were assessed for their optimal walking ability, i.e., the ability of walking with the least support device or no device as they could do safely and confidently. The participants were also assessed for their amount of weight-bearing on the upper limbs or upper limb loading while walking, amount of weight-bearing on the lower limbs or lower limb loading while stepping of the other leg, and walking performance.

Results: The findings indicated that approximately one third of the participants (31%) could progress their walking ability from their current ability, whereby four participants could even walk without a walking device. The amount of upper limb loading while walking, lower limb loading ability, and walking performance were significantly different among the groups of optimal walking ability ( p < 0 . 05 ). Furthermore, the amount of upper limb loading showed negative correlation to the amount of lower limb loading and walking performance ( ρ =- 0 . 351 to - 0.493, p < 0 . 05 ).

Conclusion: The findings suggest the potential benefit of using the upper limb loading device and the amount of upper limb loading for walking device prescription, and monitoring the change of walking ability among ambulatory individuals with SCI.

Keywords: Weight-bearing; crutches; physical therapy; rehabilitation; walker; walking.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
(a) An upper limb loading device and (b) its real-time display section from mobile application (mini-patent application number: 2003003449).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Saensook W, Phonthee S, Srisim K, Mato L, Wattanapan P, Amatachaya S. Ambulatory assistive devices and walking performance in patients with incomplete spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2014; 52(3):216–9. - PubMed
    1. Melis EH, Torres-Moreno R, Barbeau H, Lemaire ED. Analysis of assisted-gait characteristics in persons with incomplete spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 1999; 37(6):430–9. - PubMed
    1. Bateni H, Maki BE. Assistive devices for balance and mobility: benefits, demands, and adverse consequences. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 86(1): 134–45. - PubMed
    1. Haubert LL, Gutierrez DD, Newsam CJ, Gronley JK, Mulroy SJ, Perry J. A comparison of shoulder joint forces during ambulation with crutches versus a walker in persons with incomplete spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006; 87(1):63–70. - PubMed
    1. Water RL, Adkins R, Yakura J, Vigil D. Prediction of ambulatory performance based on motor scores derived from standards of the American Spinal Injury Association. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75(7):756–60. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources