Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 May 14:15:649459.
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.649459. eCollection 2021.

Neurostimulation for Stroke Rehabilitation

Affiliations
Review

Neurostimulation for Stroke Rehabilitation

Windsor Kwan-Chun Ting et al. Front Neurosci. .

Abstract

Neurological injuries such as strokes can lead to important loss in motor function. Thanks to neuronal plasticity, some of the lost functionality may be recovered over time. However, the recovery process is often slow and incomplete, despite the most effective conventional rehabilitation therapies. As we improve our understanding of the rules governing activity-dependent plasticity, neuromodulation interventions are being developed to harness neural plasticity to achieve faster and more complete recovery. Here, we review the principles underlying stimulation-driven plasticity as well as the most commonly used stimulation techniques and approaches. We argue that increased spatiotemporal precision is an important factor to improve the efficacy of neurostimulation and drive a more useful neuronal reorganization. Consequently, closed-loop systems and optogenetic stimulation hold theoretical promise as interventions to promote brain repair after stroke.

Keywords: brain-computer interfaces; closed-loop stimulation; neural plasticity; neuromodulation; neurostimulation; optogenetic stimulation; stroke.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Stimulation Paradigms to Induce Plasticity. Depiction of three main stimulation strategies used to induce plasticity. With repetitive stimulation, pre-synaptic neurons are activated directly and post-synaptic neurons are activated transsynaptically. With paired stimulation, the synchronization of pre- and post-synaptic populations is controlled directly by the stimulation of two points of the nervous system. Repetitive and paired stimulation can be applied in an open-loop manner, with no regard to current brain or behavioral state. In closed-loop approaches, however, the stimulation of a neuronal (post-synaptic) population can be precisely timed with neuronal activity (e.g., action potentials or EEG). These three different strategies all aim to induce coincidental activity in pre- and post-synaptic neurons with such a timing that would result in either LTP- or LTD-like effects, according to the rules of Hebbian STDP.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Acker L., Pino E. N., Boyden E. S., Desimone R. (2016). FEF inactivation with improved optogenetic methods. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 113 E7297–E7306. 10.1073/pnas.1610784113 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Adkins D. L., Hsu J. E., Jones T. A. (2008). Motor cortical stimulation promotes synaptic plasticity and behavioral improvements following sensorimotor cortex lesions. Exp. Neurol. 212 14–28. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2008.01.031 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahn S. M., Jung D. H., Lee H. J., Pak M. E., Jung Y. J., Shin Y. I., et al. (2020). Contralesional application of transcranial direct current stimulation on functional improvement in ischemic stroke mice. Stroke 51 2208–2218. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.029221 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ajiboye A. B., Willett F. R., Young D. R., Memberg W. D., Murphy B. A., Miller J. P., et al. (2017). Restoration of reaching and grasping movements through brain-controlled muscle stimulation in a person with tetraplegia: a proof-of-concept demonstration. Lancet 389 1821–1830. 10.1016/s0140-6736(17)30601-3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Antal A., Alekseichuk I., Bikson M., Brockmöller J., Brunoni A. R., Chen R., et al. (2017). Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines. Clin. Neurophysiol. 128 1774–1809. 10.1016/j.clinph.2017.06.001 - DOI - PMC - PubMed