Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 May 17:2021:8882368.
doi: 10.1155/2021/8882368. eCollection 2021.

Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Preclinical Infertility Cytotherapy: A Retrospective Review

Affiliations
Review

Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Preclinical Infertility Cytotherapy: A Retrospective Review

Zhuo Chang et al. Stem Cells Int. .

Abstract

Infertility is a global reproductive disorder which is caused by a variety of complex diseases. Infertility affects the individual, family, and community through physical, psychological, social and economic consequences. The results from recent preclinical studies regarding stem cell-based therapies are promising. Stem cell-based therapies cast a new hope for infertility treatment as a replacement or regeneration strategy. The main features and application prospects of mesenchymal stem cells in the future of infertility should be understood by clinicians. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are multipotent stem cells with abundant source, active proliferation, and multidirectional differentiation potential. MSCs play a role through cell homing, secretion of active factors, and participation in immune regulation. Another advantage is that, compared with embryonic stem cells, there are fewer ethical factors involved in the application of MSCs. However, a number of questions remain to be answered prior to safe and effective clinical application. In this review, we summarized the recent status of MSCs in the application of the diseases related to or may cause to infertility and suggest a possible direction for future cytotherapy to infertility.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflict of interest related to the preparation and submission of this review.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Liang G., Zhu Q., He X., et al. Effects of oil-soluble versus water-soluble contrast media at hysterosalpingography on pregnancy outcomes in women with a low risk of tubal disease: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2020;10(10, article e039166) doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039166. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aghajanova L., Hoffman J., Mok-Lin E., Herndon C. N. Obstetrics and gynecology residency and fertility Needs. Reproductive Sciences. 2017;24(3):428–434. doi: 10.1177/1933719116657193. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Adamson G. D., Baker V. L. Subfertility: causes, treatment and outcome. Best Practice & Research. Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2003;17(2):169–185. doi: 10.1016/S1521-6934(02)00146-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stevenson E. L., Hershberger P. E., Bergh P. A. Evidence-based care for couples with infertility. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing. 2016;41(1):100–110. doi: 10.1016/j.jogn.2015.10.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tarín J. J., García-Pérez M. A., Cano A. Assisted reproductive technology results: why are live-birth percentages so low? Molecular Reproduction and Development. 2014;81(7):568–583. doi: 10.1002/mrd.22340. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources