Effects of a Vibrating Foam Roller on Ipsilateral and Contralateral Neuromuscular Function and the Hamstrings-to-Quadriceps Ratios
- PMID: 34055140
- PMCID: PMC8136610
- DOI: 10.70252/KZJQ7357
Effects of a Vibrating Foam Roller on Ipsilateral and Contralateral Neuromuscular Function and the Hamstrings-to-Quadriceps Ratios
Abstract
The effects of vibrating foam rolling the hamstrings on range of motion (ROM), hamstrings-to-quadriceps (H:Q) ratios, muscle activation, and peak torque (PT) of the quadriceps and hamstrings have yet to be extensively studied. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of a vibrating foam roller on the hamstrings. Fifteen resistance trained women (mean age ± SD = 22.9 ± 2.0 years, height = 162.7 ± 4.8 cm, body mass = 66.0 ± 9.7 kgs, BMI = 24.9 ± 3.3 kg·m2) participated in five separate testing sessions to examine pre- and post-testing PT, H:Q ratios, muscle activation of the quadriceps and hamstrings, and ROM of the hamstrings. Testing sessions consisted of a foam rolling, a vibrating foam rolling, a vibration-only, and a control condition. Hamstrings ROM increased for both limbs with the exception of the vibration condition for the untreated limb (p = 0.003). The untreated limb had a quadriceps PT increase from preto post-testing (p = 0.014). Concentric hamstrings PT for both limbs decreased pre- to post-testing for all conditions (p = 0.013). Eccentric hamstrings PT for both limbs decreased pre- to post-testing (p = 0.026). Conventional H:Q ratios decreased pre- to post-testing for both the treated and untreated limbs (p < 0.001). Functional H:Q ratios decreased for both limbs pre- to post-testing (p < 0.001). Although hamstrings ROM increased in both limbs, foam rolling, vibrating foam rolling, and vibration-only could possibly decrease performance measures of the ipsilateral and contralateral limbs.
Keywords: Self-myofascial release; electromyography; flexibility; injury risk; vibration.
Similar articles
-
Effects of Foam Rolling on Range of Motion, Peak Torque, Muscle Activation, and the Hamstrings-to-Quadriceps Strength Ratios.J Strength Cond Res. 2018 Jul;32(7):1821-1830. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002468. J Strength Cond Res. 2018. PMID: 29401195
-
Acute effects of static stretching on peak torque and the hamstrings-to-quadriceps conventional and functional ratios.Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2013 Feb;23(1):38-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2011.01348.x. Epub 2011 Jun 15. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2013. PMID: 21672027
-
FOUR WEEKS OF ROLLER MASSAGE TRAINING DID NOT IMPACT RANGE OF MOTION, PAIN PRESSURE THRESHOLD, VOLUNTARY CONTRACTILE PROPERTIES OR JUMP PERFORMANCE.Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2018 Aug;13(5):835-845. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2018. PMID: 30276016 Free PMC article.
-
Self-Mobilization Using a Foam Roller Versus a Roller Massager: Which Is More Effective for Increasing Hamstrings Flexibility?J Sport Rehabil. 2017 Jan;26(1):94-100. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2015-0035. Epub 2016 Aug 24. J Sport Rehabil. 2017. PMID: 27632826 Review.
-
Foam Rolling Training Effects on Range of Motion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Sports Med. 2022 Oct;52(10):2523-2535. doi: 10.1007/s40279-022-01699-8. Epub 2022 May 26. Sports Med. 2022. PMID: 35616852 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Positional transversal release is effective as stretching on range of movement, performance and balance: a cross-over study.BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2022 Nov 30;14(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s13102-022-00599-8. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2022. PMID: 36451202 Free PMC article.
-
Does Vibration Foam Roller Influence Performance and Recovery? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Sports Med Open. 2022 Mar 4;8(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s40798-022-00421-2. Sports Med Open. 2022. PMID: 35244802 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of a Tart Cherry Supplement on Recovery from Exhaustive Exercise.J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2023 Aug 18;8(3):121. doi: 10.3390/jfmk8030121. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2023. PMID: 37606416 Free PMC article.
-
Sitting Less, Recovering Faster: Investigating the Relationship between Daily Sitting Time and Muscle Recovery following Intense Exercise: A Pilot Study.J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2024 Jan 29;9(1):24. doi: 10.3390/jfmk9010024. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2024. PMID: 38390924 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of A Single Vibration Foam Rolling and Static Stretching Exercise on the Muscle Function and Mechanical Properties of the Hamstring Muscles.J Sports Sci Med. 2022 Jun 1;21(2):287-297. doi: 10.52082/jssm.2022.287. eCollection 2022 Jun. J Sports Sci Med. 2022. PMID: 35719228 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Behm D, Lau R, O’leary J, Rayner M, Burton E, Lavers L. Acute effects of unilateral self-administered static stretching on contralateral limb performance. J Perform Health Res. 2019;3(1):1–7.
-
- Behm DG, Do Wilke J. Self-myofascial release devices release myofascia? Rolling mechanisms: A narrative review. Sports Med (Auckland, NZ) 2019;49:1173–1181. - PubMed
-
- Cavanaugh TM, Aboodarda JS, Hodgson DD, Behm GD. Foam rolling of quadriceps decreases biceps femoris activation. J Strength Cond Res. 2017;31(8):2238–2245. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources