Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 17:2021:8833025.
doi: 10.1155/2021/8833025. eCollection 2021.

Retrograde Popliteal Access for Challenging Superficial Femoral Artery Occlusion

Affiliations

Retrograde Popliteal Access for Challenging Superficial Femoral Artery Occlusion

Georges Ibrahim et al. Int J Vasc Med. .

Abstract

Retrograde popliteal access has long been established as an alternative to the antegrade approach to occlusive lesions in the superficial femoral artery (SFA). However, early reports with high complication rates (dissection, hematomas, aneurysms, and arteriovenous shunts at the puncture site) reduced enthusiasm for this technique. In recent years, with the development of thinner sheaths and low profile angioplasty devices, retrograde popliteal access has resurfaced as a viable technique, mostly in combination with or after failure of the more classical antegrade approach. In this retrospective study, we will report the safety and efficacy of the retrograde popliteal approach in the treatment of superficial femoral artery chronic total occlusions, in 13 consecutive patients between January 2017 and January 2021. The results showed 100% successful puncture of the popliteal artery and 100% successful recanalization and stenting of the superficial femoral artery with a total of 2 complications related to the puncture site and zero periprocedural mortality. In conclusion, the retrograde popliteal approach appears to be an effective and safe alternative to the common SFA complete total occlusion (CTO) treatment approach.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a, b) Prerecanalization; (c, d) postrecanalization.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a, b) Prerecanalization; (c) postrecanalization.

References

    1. Smolock C. J., Anaya-Ayala J. E., Kaufman Y., et al. Current efficacy of open and endovascular interventions for advanced superficial femoral artery occlusive disease. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2013;58(5):1267–1275.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.02.252. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barbetta I., van den Berg J. Access and hemostasis: femoral and popliteal approaches and closure devices—why, what, when, and how? Seminars in Interventional Radiology. 2014;31(4):353–360. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1393972. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bolia A., Miles K. A., Brennan J., Bell P. R. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of occlusions of the femoral and popliteal arteries by subintimal dissection. Cardiovascular and interventional radiology. 1990;13(6):357–363. doi: 10.1007/BF02578675. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Met R., Van Lienden K. P., Koelemay M. J. W., Bipat S., Legemate D. A., Reekers J. A. Subintimal angioplasty for peripheral arterial occlusive disease: a systematic review. CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology. 2008;31(4):687–697. doi: 10.1007/s00270-008-9331-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tisi P. V., Mirnezami A., Baker S., Tawn J., Parvin S. D., Darke S. G. Role of subintimal angioplasty in the treatment of chronic lower limb ischaemia. European Journal of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery. 2002;24(5):417–422. doi: 10.1053/ejvs.2002.1754. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources