Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 20:9:e11478.
doi: 10.7717/peerj.11478. eCollection 2021.

Molecular epidemiology of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium clinical isolates in a tertiary care hospital in southern Thailand: a retrospective study

Affiliations

Molecular epidemiology of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium clinical isolates in a tertiary care hospital in southern Thailand: a retrospective study

Phanvasri Saengsuwan et al. PeerJ. .

Abstract

Objective: Vancomycin-resistant enterococci are nosocomial pathogens that are responsible for commonly causing healthcare-associated infections, and they exhibit increased resistance to many antimicrobials, particularly to vancomycin. The epidemiological data available on vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) in Thailand are inadequate.

Methods: Using enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus-polymerase chain reaction (ERIC-PCR), this study investigated genes that encode antimicrobial resistance and genetic relatedness to further understand VRE prevalence. Ninety VRE isolates were collected between 2011 and 2019 from a tertiary care hospital in southern Thailand. Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined using the disk diffusion method and E-test methods. Multiplex PCR was performed to detect the van gene and virulence genes.

Results: The study showed a high prevalence of diverse multidrug-resistant VRE strains. The prevalence of VRE infection was the highest in 2014 (28 isolates, 39.4%). VRE were mostly found in the urogenital tract (26 isolates, 28.9%), followed by the digestive tract (20%), body fluid, i.e., pancreatic cyst fluid, peritoneal dialysis fluid, Jackson-Pratt (JP) drain (20%), and blood specimens (10%). Patients in medical and surgical wards had 71.1% multi-drug-resistant and 28.9% extensively drug-resistant (XDR) VRE strains, respectively. The most prevalent antibiotic resistance was to ampicillin (74.4%). Susceptibility to gentamicin and meropenem were similar (7% and 10%, respectively). Four isolates (4.4%) were resistant to colistin. Only vanA was detected among the strains. The virulence gene test showed that the detection rates of enterococcal surface protein (esp) and hyaluronidase (hyl) genes were 91.1% and 5.6%, respectively. According to ERIC-PCR analysis, 51 of 90 strains had clonality, with a similarity rate of 95%.

Conclusions: We conclude that there is a need to implement infection control practices and active surveillance. Molecular techniques can effectively detect antibiotic-resistant genes, which would allow monitoring to control VRE infection in hospitals.

Keywords: Antibiotic resistance; Enterococci; Multiplex PCR; Van genes; Virulence determinants.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare there are no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Multiplex PCR positive isolates.
Lane M = marker 100-1000 bp; lane 1 = E. faecalis ATCC 51299 vanB positive control; lane 2 = E. faecium ATCC 700221 vanA positive control; lane 3 = vanA positive from clinical strain E. faecium ; lane 4 = esp positive from clinical strain E. faecium; lane 5 = hyl positive from clinical strain E. faecium; lane 6 = rrs genes and ddlE.faecium from clinical strain; lane 7 = negative control .
Figure 2
Figure 2. Dendrogram of ERIC-PCR patterns among 90 VRE isolates.
Dendrogram of ERIC-PCR patterns showing the genetic relationship among 90 VRE isolates collected from clinical specimen in Songklanagarind Hospital, Thailand. Similarity > 95% were considered for clustering of isolates.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Agudelo Higuita NI, Huycke MM. Enterococcal disease, epidemiology, and implications for treatment. In: Gilmore MS, Clewell DB, Clewell DB, Ike Y, Shankar N, editors. Enterococci: from commensals to leading causes of drug resistant infection. Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary; Boston: 2014.
    1. Antony SJ, Ladner J, Stratton CW, Raudales F, Dummer SJ. High-level aminoglycoside-resistant enterococcus causing endocarditis successfully treated with a combination of ampicillin, imipenem and vancomycin. Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases. 1997;29:628–630. doi: 10.3109/00365549709035908. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arias CA, Contreras GA, Murray BE. Management of multidrug-resistant enterococcal infections. Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 2010;16:555–562. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03214.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arshadi M, Mahmoudi M, Motahar MS, Soltani S, Pourmand MR. Virulence determinants and antimicrobial resistance patterns of vancomycin-resistant enterococcus faecium isolated from different sources in southwest Iran. Iranian Journal of Public Health. 2018;47:264–272. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bhatt P, Sahni A, Praharaj A, Grover N, Kumar M, Chaudhari C, Khajuria A. Detection of glycopeptide resistance genes in enterococci by multiplex PCR. Medical Journal Armed Forces India. 2015;71:43–47. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2014.03.005. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources