Scalable modEls of Community rehAbilitation for Individuals Recovering From COVID:19 reLated illnEss: A Longitudinal Service Evaluation Protocol-"SeaCole Cohort Evaluation"
- PMID: 34055711
- PMCID: PMC8155345
- DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.628333
Scalable modEls of Community rehAbilitation for Individuals Recovering From COVID:19 reLated illnEss: A Longitudinal Service Evaluation Protocol-"SeaCole Cohort Evaluation"
Abstract
Introduction: High levels of physical, cognitive, and psychosocial impairments are anticipated for those recovering from the COVID-19. In the UK, ~50% of survivors will require additional rehabilitation. Despite this, there is currently no evidence-based guideline available in England and Wales that addresses the identification, timing and nature of effective interventions to manage the morbidity associated following COVID-19. It is now timely to accelerate the development and evaluation of a rehabilitation service to support patients and healthcare services. Nuffield Health have responded by configuring a scalable rehabilitation pathway addressing the immediate requirements for those recovering from COVID-19 in the community. Methods and Analysis: This long-term evaluation will examine the effectiveness of a 12-week community rehabilitation programme for COVID-19 patients who have been discharged following in-patient treatment. Consisting of two distinct 6-week phases; Phase 1 is an entirely remote service, delivered via digital applications. Phase 2 sees the same patients transition into a gym-based setting for supervised group-based rehabilitation. Trained rehabilitation specialists will coach patients across areas such as goal setting, exercise prescription, symptom management and emotional well-being. Outcomes will be collected at 0, 6, and 12 weeks and at 6- and 12-months. Primary outcome measures will assess changes in health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) and COVID-19 symptoms using EuroQol Five Dimension Five Level Version (EQ-5D-5L) and Dyspnea-12, respectively. Secondary outcome measures of the Duke Activity Status Questionnaire (DASI), 30 s sit to stand test, General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Patient Experience Questionnaire (PEQ) and Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALY) will allow for the evaluation of outcomes, mediators and moderators of outcome, and cost-effectiveness of treatment. Discussion: This evaluation will investigate the immediate and long-term impact, as well as the cost effectiveness of a blended rehabilitation programme for COVID-19 survivors. This evaluation will provide a founding contribution to the literature, evaluating one of the first programmes of this type in the UK. The evaluation has international relevance, with the potential to show how a new model of service provision can support health services in the wake of COVID-19. Trial Registration: Current Trials ISRCTN ISRCTN14707226 Web: http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN14707226.
Keywords: COVID-19; NHS; digital health; emotional well-being; exercise; independent sector; rehabilitation.
Copyright © 2021 Kelly, Innes, Holl, Mould, Powell, Burns, Doherty, Whyte, King and Deniszczyc.
Conflict of interest statement
JK reports no conflict of interest however is a voluntary member of Nuffield Health's External Research Advisory Board. BK, AI, MH, LM, and DD report personal fees from Nuffield Health outside of the submitted work. SP was a member of Nuffield Health's External Research Advisory Board and holds a Chair of Public Health position within Manchester Metropolitan University, funded by Nuffield Health. The development of this pathway has been funded by Nuffield Health (Registered Charity Numbers: 205533 in England and Wales and SC041793 in Scotland). The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Improved clinical outcomes in response to a 12-week blended digital and community-based long-COVID-19 rehabilitation programme.Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 May 24;10:1149922. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1149922. eCollection 2023. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023. PMID: 37293307 Free PMC article.
-
Rehabilitation Exercise and psycholoGical support After covid-19 InfectioN' (REGAIN): a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.Trials. 2021 Jan 6;22(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04978-9. Trials. 2021. PMID: 33407804 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of a social prescribing intervention in North East England on adults with type 2 diabetes: the SPRING_NE multimethod study.Public Health Res (Southampt). 2023 Mar;11(2):1-185. doi: 10.3310/AQXC8219. Public Health Res (Southampt). 2023. PMID: 37254700
-
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of four different strategies for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in the general population (CoV-Surv Study): a structured summary of a study protocol for a cluster-randomised, two-factorial controlled trial.Trials. 2021 Jan 8;22(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04982-z. Trials. 2021. PMID: 33419461 Free PMC article.
-
Youth violence intervention programme for vulnerable young people attending emergency departments in London: a rapid evaluation.Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Jul;11(10):1-122. doi: 10.3310/JWKT0492. Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023. PMID: 37470144
Cited by
-
Cognitive functions in COVID-19 survivors, approaches strategies, and impact on health systems: a qualitative systematic review.Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2025 Feb;275(1):5-49. doi: 10.1007/s00406-023-01662-2. Epub 2023 Aug 30. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2025. PMID: 37648954
-
Improved clinical outcomes in response to a 12-week blended digital and community-based long-COVID-19 rehabilitation programme.Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 May 24;10:1149922. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1149922. eCollection 2023. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023. PMID: 37293307 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical