Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 May 30;21(5):35.
doi: 10.1007/s11882-021-01012-z.

Allergens from Edible Insects: Cross-reactivity and Effects of Processing

Affiliations
Review

Allergens from Edible Insects: Cross-reactivity and Effects of Processing

Laura De Marchi et al. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. .

Abstract

Purpose of review: The recent introduction of edible insects in Western countries has raised concerns about their safety in terms of allergenic reactions. The characterization of insect allergens, the sensitization and cross-reactivity mechanisms, and the effects of food processing represent crucial information for risk assessment.

Recent findings: Allergic reactions to different insects and cross-reactivity with crustacean and inhalant allergens have been described, with the identification of new IgE-binding proteins besides well-known pan-allergens. Depending on the route of sensitization, different potential allergens seem to be involved. Food processing may affect the solubility and the immunoreactivity of insect allergens, with results depending on species and type of proteins. Chemical/enzymatic hydrolysis, in some cases, abolishes immunoreactivity. More studies based on subjects with a confirmed insect allergy are necessary to identify major and minor allergens and the role of the route of sensitization. The effects of processing need to be further investigated to assess the risk associated with the ingestion of insect-containing food products.

Keywords: Arginine kinase; Cross-reactivity; Edible insects; Food allergy; Food processing; Tropomyosin.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Simplified classification of the insect species discussed in the present review

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kouřimská L, Adámková A. Nutritional and sensory quality of edible insects. NFS J. 2016;4:22–26. doi: 10.1016/j.nfs.2016.07.001. - DOI
    1. van Huis A, Itterbeeck JV, Klunder H, Mertens E, Halloran A, Muir G, Vantomme P. Edible insect: future prospects for food and feed security. Roma: Fao forestry Papers; 2013.
    1. Rumpold BA, Schlüter OK. Nutritional composition and safety aspects of edible insects. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2013;57:802–823. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201200735. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Akhtar Y, Isman MB. Insects as an alternative protein source. In: Yada RY, editor. Proteins Food Process. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing; 2018.
    1. Fowles TM, Nansen C. Insect-based bioconversion: value from food waste. In: Närvänen E, Mesiranta N, Mattila M, Heikkinen A, editors. Food Waste Manag. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan; 2020.

Publication types