Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021;24(5-6):291-303.
doi: 10.1159/000515006. Epub 2021 May 31.

Development and Validation of a Comprehensive Genomics Knowledge Scale

Affiliations

Development and Validation of a Comprehensive Genomics Knowledge Scale

Michael D Linderman et al. Public Health Genomics. 2021.

Abstract

Background: Genomic testing is increasingly employed in clinical, research, educational, and commercial contexts. Genomic literacy is a prerequisite for the effective application of genomic testing, creating a corresponding need for validated tools to assess genomics knowledge. We sought to develop a reliable measure of genomics knowledge that incorporates modern genomic technologies and is informative for individuals with diverse backgrounds, including those with clinical/life sciences training.

Methods: We developed the GKnowM Genomics Knowledge Scale to assess the knowledge needed to make an informed decision for genomic testing, appropriately apply genomic technologies and participate in civic decision-making. We administered the 30-item draft measure to a calibration cohort (n = 1,234) and subsequent participants to create a combined validation cohort (n = 2,405). We performed a multistage psychometric calibration and validation using classical test theory and item response theory (IRT) and conducted a post-hoc simulation study to evaluate the suitability of a computerized adaptive testing (CAT) implementation.

Results: Based on exploratory factor analysis, we removed 4 of the 30 draft items. The resulting 26-item GKnowM measure has a single dominant factor. The scale internal consistency is α = 0.85, and the IRT 3-PL model demonstrated good overall and item fit. Validity is demonstrated with significant correlation (r = 0.61) with an existing genomics knowledge measure and significantly higher scores for individuals with adequate health literacy and healthcare providers (HCPs), including HCPs who work with genomic testing. The item bank is well suited to CAT, achieving high accuracy (r = 0.97 with the full measure) while administering a mean of 13.5 items.

Conclusion: GKnowM is an updated, broadly relevant, rigorously validated 26-item measure for assessing genomics knowledge that we anticipate will be useful for assessing population genomic literacy and evaluating the effectiveness of genomics educational interventions.

Keywords: Computerized adaptive testing; Genomic literacy; Genomic sequencing; Informed decision-making; Knowledge measure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest

N.T. is an employee of and N.T. and D.J.W. hold an ownership interest in Assessment Systems Corporation. R.C.G. has received compensation for advising the following companies: A.I.A., Genomic Life Grail, Humanity, Kneed Media, OptumLabs, Verily, and VibrentHealth; and R.C.G. is a co-founder of Genome Medical, Inc, a technology and services company providing genetics expertise to patients, providers, employers, and care systems.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:. IRT analysis.
(a) IRT Test Information Function (TIF). (b) IRT Conditional Standard Error of Measurement (CSEM) function. (c) Histogram of full test IRT scores (θ) for both cohorts.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:. Self-assessed knowledge.
Percentage of individuals at each full test IRT score (θ) endorsing different self-assessed ratings of genomics knowledge. Only bins with more than 10 individuals are shown.

References

    1. Birney E, Vamathevan J, Goodhand P. Genomics in healthcare: GA4GH looks to 2022. doi.org. 2017. Oct;203554.
    1. Harvey EK, Fogel CE, Peyrot M, Christensen KD, Terry SF, McInerney JD. Providers’ knowledge of genetics: A survey of 5915 individuals and families with genetic conditions. Genet Med. 2007. May;9(5):259–67. - PubMed
    1. Syurina E V, Brankovic I, Probst-Hensch N, Brand A. Genome-based health literacy: a new challenge for public health genomics. Public Health Genomics. 2011. Jan;14(4–5):201–10. - PubMed
    1. Saul RA. Genetic and genomic literacy in pediatric primary care. Pediatrics. 2013. Dec;132(Suppl 3):S198–202. - PubMed
    1. Kaye C, Korf B. Genetic literacy and competency. Pediatrics. 2013. Dec;132(Suppl 3):S224–30. - PubMed

Publication types