Flexural Strength of an Indirect Composite Modified with Single-Wall Carbon Nanotubes
- PMID: 34058771
- PMCID: PMC10959625
- DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1721315
Flexural Strength of an Indirect Composite Modified with Single-Wall Carbon Nanotubes
Abstract
Objectives: The low resistance to fracture has limited the use of indirect composite resins for dental restorations, particularly in regions that are exposed to strong occlusal forces. To overcome this issue, different types of reinforcement for composites have been proposed, one of which is carbon nanotubes (CNTs). The aim of this study was to evaluate the flexural resistance of one commercial indirect composite resin (Sinfony, 3M/ESPE) after incorporation of single-wall carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs; Sigma-Aldrich, Inc., St. Louis, Missouri, United States) with or without the silanization form.
Materials and methods: Specimens of composite resin were fabricated in a Teflon mold. The composite resin was prepared according to the manufacturer's instructions (n = 10 for each group), with SWCNTs in three concentrations.
Statistical analysis: The SWCNTs and SWCNT/SiO2-ATES specimens were evaluated by transmission electron microscopy, and a flexural test was conducted according to the ISO 4049/2009. Flexural strength data in MPa were submitted to one-way ANOVA following Tukey (p < 0.05).
Results: The SWCNTs did not improve the flexural strength of indirect composite resin when compared with the control, independent of the concentration added (p > 0.05). However, when SWCNTs and SWCNTs/SiO2-ATES were compared, the SWCNTs/SiO2-ATES showed higher values than the three concentrations of SWCNTs (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: The silanization process improves the SWCNTs strength proprieties, but the modification of chemical bonding between SWCNT and SWCNT/SiO2-ATES modified resins, in different concentrations, did not improve the composite resin flexural strength.
The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Conflict of interest statement
None declared.
Figures



References
-
- Suzuki S, Nagai E, Taira Y, Minesaki Y. In vitro wear of indirect composite restoratives. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;88(04):431–436. - PubMed
-
- Jordan R E, Suzuki M. Posterior composite restorations. Where and how they work best. J Am Dent Assoc. 1991;122(11):30–37. - PubMed
-
- Lacy A M. A critical look at posterior composite restorations. J Am Dent Assoc. 1987;114(03):357–362. - PubMed
-
- Manhart J, Chen H, Hamm G, Hickel R. Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Oper Dent. 2004;29(05):481–508. - PubMed
-
- Wilder A D, Jr., Bayne S C, Heymann H O. Long-term clinical performance of direct posterior composites. Trans Acad Dent Mater. 1996;9(33):151–169.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources