Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 31;27(1):55.
doi: 10.1186/s10020-021-00318-y.

Extracellular CIRP decreases Siglec-G expression on B-1a cells skewing them towards a pro-inflammatory phenotype in sepsis

Affiliations

Extracellular CIRP decreases Siglec-G expression on B-1a cells skewing them towards a pro-inflammatory phenotype in sepsis

William Royster et al. Mol Med. .

Abstract

Background: Sepsis is a life-threatening disease syndrome caused by a dysregulated host response to infection and injury. Extracellular cold-inducible RNA-binding protein (eCIRP) acts as a damage-associated molecular pattern. Peritoneal cavity (PerC) B-1a cells attenuate inflammation and tissue injury by spontaneous releasing natural IgM and IL-10. Sialic acid-binding immunoglobulin-type lectin-G (Siglec-G) is a CD33-related receptor highly expressed in B-1a cells to serve critical immunoregulatory functions. In sepsis, B-1a cell numbers in PerC are decreased. We hypothesized that eCIRP causes the reduction of PerC B-1a cells and alters their function during sepsis.

Methods: Sepsis was induced in WT and CIRP-/- mice by cecal ligation and puncture (CLP). PerC washout cells were collected and B-1a cells and Siglec-G were assessed by flow cytometry. Mice were i.p. injected with recombinant murine (rm) CIRP and after 20 h, Siglec-G expression in PerC B-1a cells were assessed. PerC B-1a cells were treated with rmCIRP for 4 h and Siglec-G expression was assessed. PerC B-1a cells were pre-treated with anti-Siglec-G Ab and then after stimulated with rmCIRP for 24 h, IL-6 levels in the culture supernatants were assessed.

Results: eCIRP levels in the PerC were elevated in septic mice. In WT mice, the frequencies and numbers of total and Siglec-G+ B-1a cells in the PerC were significantly decreased in the CLP group compared to sham group, whereas in CIRP-/- mice, their frequencies and numbers in sepsis were significantly rescued compared to WT septic mice. Mice injected with rmCIRP showed decreased frequencies and numbers of total and Siglec-G+ PerC B-1a cells compared to PBS-injected mice. In vitro treatment of PerC B-1a cells with rmCIRP demonstrated significant reduction in Siglec-G mRNA and protein compared to PBS group. PerC B-1a cells treated with anti-Siglec-G Ab had significantly higher production of IL-6 in response to rmCIRP compared to IgG control. Anti-Siglec-G Ab treated B-1a cells co-cultured with macrophages produced significantly higher levels of IL-6, and TNF-α, and lower levels of IL-10 compared to IgG-treated B-1a cells and macrophage co-cultures stimulated with rmCIRP.

Conclusion: eCIRP reduces PerC B-1a cell pool and skews them to a pro-inflammatory phenotype by downregulating Siglec-G expression. Targeting eCIRP will retain Siglec-G expressing B-1a cells in the PerC and preserve their anti-inflammatory function in sepsis.

Keywords: B-1a cells; Sepsis; Siglec-G; TLR4; eCIRP.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declare no conflict of interest in this study.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Intraabdominal sepsis results in a loss of PerC B-1a cells, while CIRP−/− mice are protected from the loss of B-1a cells after sepsis. A After 20 h of CLP, peritoneal cavity lavage samples were collected. PerC lavage eCIRP concentration was assessed with ELISA. Data are expressed as means ± SE (n = 5–7 mice/group). The groups were compared by Student’s t-test (*p < 0.05 vs. sham mice). WT and CIRP−/− mice were randomly assigned to sham or CLP groups. 20 h after surgery, PerC lavage samples were collected for analysis. B Representative dot blots of the gating strategy of B-1a cells of sham and CLP mice are shown. C, D Status of B-1a cell’s frequencies (%) and numbers after surgery are shown. Data are expressed as means ± SE (n = 10–14 mice/group). The groups were compared by one-way ANOVA and Student–Newman–Keuls (SNK) method (*p < 0.05 vs. WT sham and #p < 0.05 vs. WT CLP mice)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Expression of Siglec-G by B-1a cells is dramatically reduced after sepsis, but its expression is protected in CIRP−/− mice after sepsis. WT and CIRP−/− mice were randomly assigned to sham or CLP groups. 20 h after CLP, peritoneal lavage samples were collected for analysis. A Representative dot blots of the gating strategy of Siglec-G expression on B-1a cells of sham and CLP mice are shown. B, C Status of Siglec-G expression by B-1a cells in terms of frequency (%) and number after surgery are shown. Data are expressed as means ± SE (n = 10–14 mice/group). The groups were compared by one-way ANOVA and Student–Newman–Keuls (SNK) method (*p < 0.05 vs. WT sham and #p < 0.05 vs. WT CLP mice)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Intraperitoneal injection of rmCIRP results in a loss of B-1a cells from the PerC. A After 20 h of i.p. injection of rmCIRP in mice, PerC lavage samples were collected. Peritoneal cells were stained with CD23, B220, and CD5 Abs and subjected to flow cytometric detection of B-1a cells frequencies. Representative dot blots of the gating strategy of B-1a cells of vehicle and rmCIRP treated mice are shown. B, C Status of B-1a cell’s frequencies and numbers after i.p. injection of PBS vehicle or rmCIRP are shown. Data are expressed as means ± SE (n = 5–7 mice/group). The groups were compared by Student’s t-test (*p < 0.05 vs. vehicle-treated mice)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
rmCIRP induces a downregulation of Siglec-G expression by B-1a cells in vivo and in vitro. 20 h after i.p. injection of rmCIRP, PerC lavage samples were collected. Peritoneal cells were stained with CD23, B220, CD5, and Siglec-G Abs and subjected to flow cytometric detection of B-1a cells and analysis of Siglec-G expression. Status of Siglec-G expression by B-1a cells in terms of A frequency and B number after i.p. injection of rmCIRP are shown. PerC B-1a cells were stimulated with rmCIRP in vitro for 24 h. Cells were stained with Siglec-G Ab and subjected to flow cytometric analysis. C Frequency of Siglec-G expression on B-1a cells after stimulation with rmCIRP are shown. Data are expressed as means ± SE (n = 6–7 mice/group). The groups were compared by Student’s t-test (*p < 0.05 vs. vehicle treatment)
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
An absence of Siglec-G results in greater production of IL-6 by B-1a cells in response to rmCIRP than WT cells. A PerC B-1a cells were collected from WT and Siglec-G−/− mice and stimulated in vitro with rmCIRP or PBS vehicle for 24 h. Supernatant was assessed by ELISA for IL-6 production. Data are expressed as means ± SE (n = 4–8 mice/group) and compared by one-way ANOVA and Student–Newman–Keuls (SNK) method (*p < 0.05 vs. WT PBS treated mice and #p < 0.05 vs. WT rmCIRP treated mice). B Blocking Siglec-G by its neutralizing Abs increases IL-6 production following rmCIRP treatment. PerC B-1a cells were collected from WT mice and pretreated with Siglec-G blocking Ab or IgG control. The cells were stimulated in vitro with rmCIRP or PBS vehicle for 24 h. Supernatant was assessed by ELISA for IL-6 production. Data are expressed as means ± SE (n = 8 mice/group) and compared by one-way ANOVA and Student–Newman–Keuls (SNK) method (*p < 0.05 vs. PBS IgG treated mice and #p < 0.05 vs. rmCIRP IgG treated mice)
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Neutralizing Siglec-G in B-1a cells causes more TNF-α, and IL-6 and less IL-10 production in rmCIRP-treated macrophage co-cultures. PerC macrophages were co-cultured with B-1a cells that had been pretreated with Siglec-G blocking Ab or IgG control and then stimulated with rmCIRP or PBS vehicle for 24 h. Supernatant A TNF-α, B IL-6, and C IL-10 concentration were assessed with ELISA. Data are expressed as means ± SE (n = 8 mice/group) and compared by one-way ANOVA and Student–Newman–Keuls (SNK) method (*p < 0.05 vs. PBS stimulated macrophages, #p < 0.05 vs. macrophages cultured with IgG treated B-1a cells stimulated with rmCIRP, p < 0.05 vs. untreated B-1a cells stimulated with rmCIRP)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aziz M, Jacob A, Yang WL, Matsuda A, Wang P. Current trends in inflammatory and immunomodulatory mediators in sepsis. J Leukoc Biol. 2013;93:329–342. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0912437. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aziz M, Holodick NE, Rothstein TL, Wang P. The role of B-1 cells in inflammation. Immunol Res. 2015;63:153–166. doi: 10.1007/s12026-015-8708-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aziz M, Holodick NE, Rothstein TL, Wang P. B-1a cells protect mice from sepsis: critical role of CREB. J Immunol. 2017;199:750–760. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1602056. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aziz M, et al. B-1a cells protect mice from sepsis-induced acute lung injury. Mol Med. 2018;24:26. doi: 10.1186/s10020-018-0029-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aziz M, Brenner M, Wang P. Extracellular CIRP (eCIRP) and inflammation. J Leukoc Biol. 2019;106:133–146. doi: 10.1002/JLB.3MIR1118-443R. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms