Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 31;11(5):e049873.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049873.

Relationship between patient safety culture and patient experience in hospital settings: a scoping review protocol

Affiliations

Relationship between patient safety culture and patient experience in hospital settings: a scoping review protocol

Adel Alabdaly et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Hospitals commonly examine patient safety culture and other quality indicators to evaluate and improve performance in relation to quality and safety. A growing body of research has separately examined relationships between patient safety culture and patient experience on clinical outcomes and other quality indicators. However, there is a knowledge gap regarding the relationship between these two important domains. This article describes the protocol for a scoping review of published literature examining the relationship between patient safety culture and patient experience in hospital settings. The scoping review will provide an overview of research into the relationship between patient safety culture and patient experience in hospital contexts, map key concepts underpinning these domains and identify research gaps for further study.

Methods and analysis: The scoping review will be conducted using the five stages of Arksey and O'Malley's framework: identify the research question; identify relevant studies; study selection; chart data; and collate, summarise and report the results. The inclusion criteria will be applied using the Population, Concept and Context Framework. Searches will be conducted in the CINAHL, Cochrane Library, ProQuest, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Scopus and SciELO databases, without applying date range limits. Hand-searching of grey literature will also be performed to find relevant, non-indexed literature. Data will be extracted using a standardised data extraction form developed by the Joanna Briggs Institute. Both descriptive and thematic analyses will be undertaken to scope key concepts within the body of reviewed literature.

Ethics and dissemination: This type of study does not require an ethics review. The results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at conferences.

Keywords: health & safety; health services administration & management; quality in health care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Desmedt M, Bergs J, Vertriest S, et al. . Systematic psychometric review of self-reported instruments to assess patient safety culture in primary care. J Adv Nurs 2018;74:539–49. 10.1111/jan.13464 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tabrizchi N, Sedaghat M. The first study of patient safety culture in Iranian primary health centers. Acta Med Iran 2012;50:505–10. - PubMed
    1. Bell BG, Reeves D, Marsden K, et al. . Safety climate in English general practices: workload pressures may compromise safety. J Eval Clin Pract 2016;22:71–6. 10.1111/jep.12437 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bonner AF, Castle NG, Perera S, et al. . Patient safety culture: a review of the nursing home literature and recommendations for practice. Ann Longterm Care 2008;16:18–22. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zohar D, Livne Y, Tenne-Gazit O, et al. . Healthcare climate: a framework for measuring and improving patient safety. Crit Care Med 2007;35:1312–7. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000262404.10203.C9 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types