Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 31;12(1):3321.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23843-0.

Impaired calcium signaling in astrocytes modulates autism spectrum disorder-like behaviors in mice

Affiliations

Impaired calcium signaling in astrocytes modulates autism spectrum disorder-like behaviors in mice

Qian Wang et al. Nat Commun. .

Abstract

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a common neurodevelopmental disorder. The mechanisms underlying ASD are unclear. Astrocyte alterations are noted in ASD patients and animal models. However, whether astrocyte dysfunction is causal or consequential to ASD-like phenotypes in mice is unresolved. Type 2 inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate 6 receptors (IP3R2)-mediated Ca2+ release from intracellular Ca2+ stores results in the activation of astrocytes. Mutations of the IP3R2 gene are associated with ASD. Here, we show that both IP3R2-null mutant mice and astrocyte-specific IP3R2 conditional knockout mice display ASD-like behaviors, such as atypical social interaction and repetitive behavior. Furthermore, we show that astrocyte-derived ATP modulates ASD-like behavior through the P2X2 receptors in the prefrontal cortex and possibly through GABAergic synaptic transmission. These findings identify astrocyte-derived ATP as a potential molecular player in the pathophysiology of ASD.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. IP3R2 null mutant (IP3R2 KO) and Aldh1L1-CreER:IP3R2loxp/loxp (IP3R2 cKO) mice exhibit ASD-like behaviors.
a, b Impaired social interaction in IP3R2 KO mice in the three-chamber test. a Social preference (object versus stranger 1, S1-O, t14 = 2.353, P = 0.0338, n = 8). b Social novelty recognition (S2-S1, t14 = 1.341, P = 0.2013, n = 8). c Enhanced recognition memory in IP3R2 KO mice in the novel object recognition test (U = 20, P = 0.0232, n = 10). d, e Increased repetitive behavior in IP3R2 KO mice in the self-grooming test (d t18 = 2.471, P = 0.0251, n = 11/7) and the marble-burying test (e t14 = 2.488, P = 0.0261, n = 8). f, g Same as (a, b) but for IP3R2 cKO mice (f t19 = 2.873, P = 0.0097, n = 11/10; g t19 = 0.9303, P = 0.3639, n = 11/10). h Same as (c) but for IP3R2 cKO mice (U = 40, P = 0.7197, n = 9/10). i, j Same as (d, e) but for IP3R2 cKO mice (i t17 = 2.845, P = 0.0112, n = 10/9; j t19 = 5.633, P = 0.2 × 10−4, n = 11/10). k, l Same as (a, b) but for IP3R2 knockdown C57BL/6 J mice (k Control vs. ShRNA1, t16 = 0.3078, p = 0.0072, n = 8/10; Control vs. shRNA2, t16 = 0.3065, p = 0.0074, n = 8/10; l Control vs. shRNA1, t16 = 0.1498, p = 0.8828, n = 8/10; Control vs. shRNA2, t16 = 1.704, p = 0.1076, n = 8/10). m Same as (c) but for IP3R2 knockdown C57BL/6J mice. n, o Same as (d, e) but for IP3R2 knockdown C57BL/6J mice. WT, wild-type mice; KO, IP3R2 null mutant mice; control, Aldh1L1-CreER mice; cKO, IP3R2 cKO mice. Data are presented as mean ± SEM; two-tailed unpaired t test (a, b, d, e, f, g, i, j, k, l, m); Mann–Whitney U-test (c, h, n, o). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ****P < 0.0001. Each data point represents an individual mouse. Comparisons with no asterisk had a P > 0.05 and were considered not significant. Source data are provided as a Source data file.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Astrocytic ATP release is impaired in IP3R2 KO mice.
a, b ATP levels in the mPFC of IP3R2 KO (a U = 0, P = 0.0002, n = 8) and IP3R2 cKO (b U = 14, P = 0.0360, n = 9/8) mice. IP3R2loxp/loxp mice were used as control (b). c, d ATP levels in the culture medium of astrocytes (c, t22 = 6.397, P = 0.3 × 10−5, n = 12) or neurons (d t12 = 0.1578, P = 0.8772, n = 7) from IP3R2 KO and WT mice. e, f Total ATP levels (e t22 = 1.620, P = 0.1195, n = 12) and intracellular ATP levels (f t22 = 0.6959, P = 0.4938, n = 12) in astrocytes from IP3R2 KO and WT mice. g Schematic experimental approach. h Two-photon calcium imaging of an hM3Dq&GCaMP6m-expressing astrocyte, with an adjacently placed glass pipette. Scale bar, 5 μm. i Representative fluorescence traces from an hM3Dq&GCaMP6m-expressing astrocyte treated with CNO or ACSF in IP3R2 WT and KO mice. A gray line represents the 200 ms of 10 mM CNO application. j Summary of the results from all imaged cells (WT vs. KO, ΔF/F change, somata: t23 = 12.473, P = 0, processes: t23 = 4.271, P = 0.286 × 103; duration, somata: t23 = 11.826, P = 0, processes: t23 = 1.305, P = 0.2058; area, somata: t23 = 7.839, P = 0, processes: t23 = 3.239, P = 0.3622 × 10−2; n = 13/12 cells from 3 mice each). Box plots present, in ascending order, minimum sample value, first quartile, median, third quartile, and maximum sample value. k Schematic experimental approach. l Same as (h) but for an hM3Dq- and ATP1.0-expressing astrocyte. Scale bar, 5 μm. m Same as (i) but for an hM3Dq- and ATP1.0-expressing astrocyte. Representative movies are shown as Supplementary Videos 1-4. n Summary of the results from all imaged cells (t16 = 10.79, P = 0.5 × 10−5, n = 9 cells from 3 mice each). o Representative fluorescence traces from hM3Dq- and ATP1.0-expressing astrocytes pre-treated with ACSF or 30 μM MRS2500 (a P2Y1R antagonist) in IP3R2 KO mice. p Summary of the results from all imaged cells (t13 = 25.20, P = 0.1 × 10−5, n = 6/9 cells from 3 mice each). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001. Two-tailed unpaired t test (af, j, n, p). Source data are provided as a Source data file.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Rescue of social behaviors by acute ATP or ATPγS treatment in IP3R2 mutant mice.
a, b Intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of 125 mg/kg ATP restored social interaction in IP3R2 KO mice (a F3,23 = 8.876, P = 0.0004; KOvehicle vs. KOATP, P = 0.0155; b F3,23 = 2.925, P = 0.0553; n = 7,7,6,7). c, d i.p. ATP treatment did not affect repetitive behaviors (c F3,25 = 5.323, P = 0.0056, n = 7,7,8,7; d F3,21 = 3.372, P = 0.0377, n = 6,6,7,6). e, f Same as (a, b) but for IP3R2 cKO mice (e F3,21 = 13.95, P = 0.32 × 10−4; cKOvehicle vs. cKOATP, P = 0.371 × 10−3; f F3,21 = 0.7249, P = 0.5484; n = 6,6,6,7). g, h Same as (c, d) but for IP3R2 cKO mice (g F3,20 = 2.761, P = 0.0689, n = 6,6,5,7; h F3,22 = 4.761, P = 0.0105, n = 6,6,8,6). i, j Intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) injection of ATPγS (50 µM) restored social interaction in IP3R2 cKO mice (i F3,31 = 4.238, P = 0.0127; cKOvehicle vs. cKOATPγs, P = 0.0339; j F3,31 = 2.059, P = 0.126; n = 8,9,9,9). k, l i.c.v. ATPγS treatment did not affect repetitive behaviors (k F3,32 = 3.942, P = 0.0168, n = 9; l F3,29 = 8.058, P = 0.0005, n = 9,7,9,8). m, n Same as (j) but for intra-mPFC injection in IP3R2 KO mice (m F3,23 = 3.401, P = 0.0348; KOvehicle vs. KOATPγS, P = 0.0099; n F3,23 = 0.9799, P = 0.4194; n = 6,7,6,8). o, p Intra-mPFC ATPγS treatment did not affect repetitive behaviors (o F3,24 = 11.87, P = 0.58 × 10−4, n = 7,7,6,8; p F3,26 = 9.106, P = 0.0003, n = 8,8,6,8). q, r Same as (m, n) but for IP3R2 cKO mice (q F3,23 = 4.721, P = 0.0104; cKOvehicle vs. cKOATPγs, P = 0.0186; r F3,23 = 1.314, P = 0.2939; n = 6,7,6,8). s, t Same as (o, p) but for IP3R2 cKO mice (s F3,24 = 13.62, P = 0.22 × 10−4, n = 7,7,6,8; t F3,26 = 4.789, P = 0.0087, n = 8,8,6,8). u, v Same as (m, n) but for IP3R2 knockdown mice (u F5,48 = 3.954, P = 0.0044; shRNA1vehicle vs. shRNA1ATPγs, P = 0.0108; shRNA2vehicle vs. shRNA2ATPγs, P = 0.0063; v F5,48 = 0.2194, P = 0.9525; n = 9). Each data point represents an individual mouse. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s (al, nt, v) or Fisher’s LSD (m, u) multiple comparison post hoc test. Source data are provided as a Source data file.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. IP3R2 mutant mice exhibit impaired GABAergic neurotransmission, which can be restored by ATPγS treatment.
a sEPSC and sIPSC recordings with and without ATPγS (25 µM) treatment in mPFC layer 5 pyramidal neurons from WT and IP3R2 KO slices. Scale bars: 20 pA, 2 s. be Bar graphs showing sEPSC and sIPSC frequency (b, d: WTACSF vs. KOACSF, two-tailed unpaired t-test, t27 = 2.173, P = 0.0387, n = 17/12; WTACSF vs. WTATPγS, two-tailed paired t-test, t16 = 0.3945, P = 0.6984, n = 17; KOACSF vs. KOATPγS, two-tailed paired t-test, t11 = 2.905, P = 0.0143, n = 12) and amplitude (c, e) in WT and IP3R2 KO slices with and without ATPγS treatment. IP3R2 KO mice exhibited impaired GABAergic neurotransmission that was restored by ATPγS treatment. f Same as (a) but for IP3R2 cKO slices. Scale bars: 20 pA, 2 s. gj Bar graphs showing sEPSC and sIPSC frequency (g, i controlACSF vs. cKOACSF, two-tailed unpaired t-test, t14 = 3.163, P = 0.0069, n = 7/9; controlACSF vs. controlATPγs, two-tailed paired t-test, t8 = 0.1744, P = 0. 8659, n = 9; cKOACSF vs. cKOATPγs, two-tailed paired t-test, t6 = 6.462, P = 0.0007, n = 7) and amplitude (h, j) in control and IP3R2 cKO slices. k, l Rescue of social behaviors in IP3R2 KO mice upon acute clonazepam (CLZ, 0.0625 mg/kg, i.p.) treatment in the three-chamber test (k U = 3, P = 0.0011; l t14 = 1.399, P = 0.1836, n = 8). m, n Same as (k, l) but for IP3R2 cKO mice (m t10 = 3.757, P = 0.0037; n t10 = 1.153, P = 0.2758, n = 6). Each data point represents an individual mouse (kn). Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. Two-tailed unpaired t test (ln). Mann–Whitney U-test (k). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. Source data are provided as a Source data file.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. P2X2 receptors in the prefrontal cortex mediate the beneficial effects of ATP on ASD-like behaviors.
a A schematic of the AAV vector carrying P2X2R-shRNA (top). The viral expression of P2X2R-shRNA (bottom right) and the injection site in the mPFC (bottom left, red box, scale bar: 100 µm). b Western blot showing P2X2R knockdown in the mPFC with AAV-P2X2R-shRNA (two-tailed unpaired t-test, t6 = 12.71, P = 0.15 × 10−4, n = 4). c, d i.p. injection of ATP (125 mg/kg) rescued social interaction in IP3R2 cKO mice, and this effect was blocked by P2X2R knockdown (c F7,45 = 6.973, P = 0.7 × 10−5; Con:Control-shRNAvehicle vs. Con:P2X2R-shRNAvehicle, P = 0.0142; Con:Control-shRNAvehicle vs. cKO:Control-shRNAvehicle, P = 0.0066; Con:Control-shRNAvehicle vs. cKO:P2X2R-shRNAvehicle, P = 0.0002; Con:P2X2R-shRNAvehicle vs. Con:P2X2R-shRNAATP, P = 0.8171; cKO:Control-shRNAvehicle vs. cKO:Control-shRNAATP, P = 0.0037; cKO:P2X2R-shRNAvehicle vs. cKO:P2X2R-shRNAATP, P = 0.8931; d F7,45 = 0.8109, P = 0.5830; n = 6,7,7,7,6,7,7,7). e sIPSC recordings with and without ATPγS (25 µM) treatment in mPFC layer 5 pyramidal neurons from control and IP3R2 cKO mice injected with control-shRNA or P2X2R-shRNA. f, g Bar graphs showing sIPSC frequency (f Con:Control-shRNAACSF vs. Con:P2X2R-shRNAACSF, two-tailed unpaired t-test, t14 = 2.381, P = 0.0320, n = 10/6; Con:Control-shRNAACSF vs. cKO:control-shRNAACSF, two-tailed unpaired t-test, t18 = 3.539, P = 0.0023, n = 10; Con:Control-shRNAACSF vs. cKO:P2X2R-shRNAACSF, two-tailed unpaired t-test, t17 = 3.273, P = 0.0045, n = 9/10; Con:P2X2R-shRNAACSF vs. Con:P2X2R-shRNAATPγs, two-tailed paired t-test, t5 = 2.001, P = 0.1018, n = 6; cKO:Control-shRNAACSF vs. cKO:Control-shRNAATPγs, two-tailed paired t-test, t9 = 2.777, P = 0.0215, n = 10; cKO:P2X2R-shRNAACSF vs. cKO:P2X2R-shRNAATPγs, two-tailed paired t-test, t8 = 0.1624, P = 0.8750, n = 9) and amplitude (g) with or without ATPγS (25 µM) treatment in mPFC layer 5 pyramidal neurons from control and IP3R2 cKO mice injected with control-shRNA or P2X2R-shRNA. P2X2R knockdown prevented the enhancing effect of ATPγS (25 µM) on sIPSC frequency in IP3R2 cKO slices. Scale bars: 20 pA, 2 s. Each data point represents an individual mouse (c, d). Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001. ns, no significant difference. One-way ANOVA with Fisher’s LSD multiple comparison post hoc test (c, d). Source data are provided as a Source data file.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bourgeron T. From the genetic architecture to synaptic plasticity in autism spectrum disorder. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2015;16:551–563. doi: 10.1038/nrn3992. - DOI - PubMed
    1. de la Torre-Ubieta L, Won H, Stein JL, Geschwind DH. Advancing the understanding of autism disease mechanisms through genetics. Nat. Med. 2016;22:345–361. doi: 10.1038/nm.4071. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nelson SB, Valakh V. Excitatory/inhibitory balance and circuit homeostasis in autism spectrum disorders. Neuron. 2015;87:684–698. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.07.033. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tabuchi K, et al. A neuroligin-3 mutation implicated in autism increases inhibitory synaptic transmission in mice. Science. 2007;318:71–76. doi: 10.1126/science.1146221. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Scuderi C, Verkhratsky A. The role of neuroglia in autism spectrum disorders. Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci. 2020;173:301–330. doi: 10.1016/bs.pmbts.2020.04.011. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms