Indirect effects of COVID-19 in referring women to gynecologic oncology, perinatology and gynecology clinics in Iran
- PMID: 34059957
- PMCID: PMC8166368
- DOI: 10.1007/s00404-021-06097-5
Indirect effects of COVID-19 in referring women to gynecologic oncology, perinatology and gynecology clinics in Iran
Abstract
Purpose: COVID-19 has captured the world. We hypothesized that this pandemic reduced referral of other non-COVID-19 patients to the hospitals or clinics, including gynecological and perinatological referrals. Women can be at risk in limited use of health services.
Methods: In this retrospective study, referrals from gynecologic oncology, perinatology, and gynecology clinics in a large teaching hospital of Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS) were compared from February 20 to May 20, 2020, with the same period in 2019. Finally, referral trends in 2020 were compared with the COVID-19 admission pattern.
Results: Total admissions to all three clinics declined 63% in 2020 compared to 2019. There was a significant relationship between the number of visits to three clinics during these2 years (p < 0.001). The reduction in referrals to the gynecology clinic was more than gynecologic oncology and perinatology. The COVID-19 referral pattern was conversely linked to gynecology-related admissions.
Conclusion: As the pandemic situation makes patients hesitant to go to the hospitals or not, health policymakers should consider other non-COVID issues, including maternal and fetal concerns. Providing safe places for other patients to visit is a goal that can be achieved through developing guidelines for nosocomial hygiene and training informed healthcare staff. Moreover, non-urgent visits should be avoided or postponed. This issue calls for new strategies, including telemedicine in situations similar to the current pandemic to both identify and manage such conditions.
Keywords: COVID-19 pandemic; Gynecology; Health policy; Perinatology; Women’s health.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare having no conflict of interest related to this work.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Effects of SARS Cov-2 epidemic on the obstetrical and gynecological emergency service accesses. What happened and what shall we expect now?Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020 Nov;254:64-68. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.09.006. Epub 2020 Sep 7. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020. PMID: 32942077 Free PMC article.
-
Application of telemedicine video visits in a maternal-fetal medicine practice at the epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic.Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2021 Nov;3(6):100469. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100469. Epub 2021 Aug 24. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2021. PMID: 34450341 Free PMC article.
-
Investigating disparities in compliance of nursing pain reassessment for obstetrics and gynecology patients.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Sep;229(3):314.e1-314.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.06.027. Epub 2023 Jun 15. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023. PMID: 37330130 Free PMC article.
-
Gynecologic cancer surveillance in the era of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19).Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2021 Jun;31(6):914-919. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001942. Epub 2020 Oct 5. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2021. PMID: 33020205 Review.
-
Gynecologic oncology at the time of COVID-19 outbreak.J Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Jul;31(4):e72. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2020.31.e72. Epub 2020 May 27. J Gynecol Oncol. 2020. PMID: 32458597 Free PMC article. Review.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials