Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021:2276:357-382.
doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1266-8_27.

A Protocol for Untargeted Metabolomic Analysis: From Sample Preparation to Data Processing

Affiliations

A Protocol for Untargeted Metabolomic Analysis: From Sample Preparation to Data Processing

Amanda L Souza et al. Methods Mol Biol. 2021.

Abstract

Untargeted metabolomics has rapidly become a profiling method of choice in many areas of research, including mitochondrial biology. Most commonly, untargeted metabolomics is performed with liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry because it enables measurement of a relatively wide range of physiochemically diverse molecules. Specifically, to assess energy pathways that are associated with mitochondrial metabolism, hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC) is often applied before analysis with a high-resolution accurate mass instrument. The workflow produces large, complex data files that are impractical to analyze manually. Here, we present a protocol to perform untargeted metabolomics on biofluids such as plasma, urine, and cerebral spinal fluid with a HILIC separation and an Orbitrap mass spectrometer. Our protocol describes each step of the analysis in detail, from preparation of solvents for chromatography to selecting parameters during data processing.

Keywords: Accurate mass; Data-dependent acquisition; HILIC; High-resolution; Liquid chromatography; Mass spectrometry; Metabolites; Metabolomics; Profiling; Quality assurance; Quality control.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Steps implemented in the untargeted metabolomic workflow, from experimental design to data processing
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Input file table with assigned study factors. This table demonstrates how to implement a study factor within the Input File Characterization page. This example includes the user-defined study factor Phenotype where experimental samples are allocated as Lean or Fatty
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Defining sample groups and ratios for differential analysis. Using the ZDF rat experiment as an example, three sample groups are defined automatically by selecting Phenotype in the Study Variables check box. The comparison ratio is defined by selecting the control group to compare to
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Study page and analysis pane. After completing the wizard, a tab is generated consisting of the study pages (Study Definition, Input Files, Samples, and Analysis Results), the analysis pages (Grouping & Ratios, Workflows) and the Analysis pane. Within the Analysis pane, users can assign the Result File name
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
A processing workflow tree. Nodes connected by edges indicate the selected functions for data processing. The workflow represented here is for the workflow template titled “Untargeted Metabolomics with Statistics Detect Unknowns with ID using Online Databases and mzLogic.” The workflow includes retention time alignment, unknown peak detection and ion association, gap filling, detection of background components unrelated to experimental samples, prediction of elemental composition, ChemSpider database searching, mzCloud spectral library matching, pathway mapping, and statistical analysis
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Results page default layout. The Main Table of the Compounds tab includes information for each of the detected compounds including annotation, elemental composition, molecular weight, peak areas, results from database searching and library matching, and univariate statistical results. Selecting a specific compound returns the associated chromatogram overlay and mass spectra
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Icons in the application toolbar supporting data review. When reviewing a Results File, data review icons are active. Selection of an icon brings the view to the front
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Recommended minimum peak intensity range for the Detect Compounds node of the Compound Discoverer software. Depending on the mass spectrometer used for data acquisition, corresponding peak intensity values should be selected for unknown peak detection

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Oliver SG, Winson MK, Kell DB, Baganz F (1998) Systematic functional analysis of the yeast genome. Trends Biotechnol 16:373–378 - PubMed
    1. Cho K, Mahieu NG, Johnson SL, Patti GJ (2014) After the feature presentation: technologies bridging untargeted metabolomics and biology. Curr Opin Biotechnol 28:143–148 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wishart DS (2019) Metabolomics for investigating physiological and pathophysiological processes. Physiol Rev 99:1819–1875 - PubMed
    1. Tebani A, Bekri S (2019) Paving the way to precision nutrition through metabolomics. Front Nutr 6:41. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nikolskiy I, Siuzdak G, Patti GJ (2015) Discriminating precursors of common fragments for large-scale metabolite profiling by triple quadrupole mass spectrometry. Bioinformatics 31:2017–2023 - PMC - PubMed