Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun 1;9(6):e19536.
doi: 10.2196/19536.

Factors That Influence the Use of Electronic Diaries in Health Care: Scoping Review

Naomi E M Daniëls  1   2 , Laura M J Hochstenbach  3 , Catherine van Zelst  1 , Marloes A van Bokhoven  2 , Philippe A E G Delespaul  1   4 , Anna J H M Beurskens  2
Affiliations

Factors That Influence the Use of Electronic Diaries in Health Care: Scoping Review

Naomi E M Daniëls et al. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. .

Abstract

Background: A large number of people suffer from psychosocial or physical problems. Adequate strategies to alleviate needs are scarce or lacking. Symptom variation can offer insights into personal profiles of coping and resilience (detailed functional analyses). Hence, diaries are used to report mood and behavior occurring in daily life. To reduce inaccuracies, biases, and noncompliance with paper diaries, a shift to electronic diaries has occurred. Although these diaries are increasingly used in health care, information is lacking about what determines their use.

Objective: The aim of this study was to map the existing empirical knowledge and gaps concerning factors that influence the use of electronic diaries, defined as repeated recording of psychosocial or physical data lasting at least one week using a smartphone or a computer, in health care.

Methods: A scoping review of the literature published between January 2000 and December 2018 was conducted using queries in PubMed and PsycInfo databases. English or Dutch publications based on empirical data about factors that influence the use of electronic diaries for psychosocial or physical purposes in health care were included. Both databases were screened, and findings were summarized using a directed content analysis organized by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).

Results: Out of 3170 articles, 22 studies were selected for qualitative synthesis. Eleven themes were determined in the CFIR categories of intervention, user characteristics, and process. No information was found for the CFIR categories inner (eg, organizational resources, innovation climate) and outer (eg, external policies and incentives, pressure from competitors) settings. Reminders, attractive designs, tailored and clear data visualizations (intervention), smartphone experience, and intrinsic motivation to change behavior (user characteristics) could influence the use of electronic diaries. During the implementation process, attention should be paid to both theoretical and practical training.

Conclusions: Design aspects, user characteristics, and training and instructions determine the use of electronic diaries in health care. It is remarkable that there were no empirical data about factors related to embedding electronic diaries in daily clinical practice. More research is needed to better understand influencing factors for optimal electronic diary use.

Keywords: compliance; delivery of health care; diary; ecological momentary assessment; intention; motivation; scoping review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Scoping review flow diagram.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Visual representation of the factors that influence the use of electronic diaries in health care.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Shindorf Z. Exploring Barriers to the Generalization of Social Skills Interventions for Children Diagnosed with ASD: A Qualitative Analysis of "Youth Engagement Through Intervention". University of Montana. 2016. [2019-09-10]. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/10911/
    1. Smith PC, Araya-Guerra R, Bublitz C, Parnes B, Dickinson LM, Van Vorst R, Westfall JM, Pace WD. Missing clinical information during primary care visits. JAMA. 2005 Feb 02;293(5):565–71. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.5.565. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Higgs J, Jones M, Loftus S, Christensen N, editors. Clinical reasoning in the health professions, fourth edition. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier; 2018.
    1. van Os J, Delespaul P, Wigman J, Myin-Germeys I, Wichers M. Beyond DSM and ICD: introducing "precision diagnosis" for psychiatry using momentary assessment technology. World Psychiatry. 2013 Jun;12(2):113–7. doi: 10.1002/wps.20046. doi: 10.1002/wps.20046. - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. van Os J, Lataster T, Delespaul P, Wichers M, Myin-Germeys I. Evidence that a psychopathology interactome has diagnostic value, predicting clinical needs: an experience sampling study. PLoS One. 2014;9(1):e86652. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086652. https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086652 - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types