Comparison of intravenous magnesium sulphate and lidocaine for attenuation of cardiovascular response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation in elective surgical patients at Zewditu Memorial Hospital Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
- PMID: 34061894
- PMCID: PMC8168879
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252465
Comparison of intravenous magnesium sulphate and lidocaine for attenuation of cardiovascular response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation in elective surgical patients at Zewditu Memorial Hospital Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Abstract
Background: Laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation are essential components of general anesthesia. But it is always associated with side effects called reflex cardiovascular responses. Many methods have been identified to attenuate these responses like intravenous lidocaine, deep inhalational anesthesia, vasodilators, intravenous magnesium sulphate even though therapeutic superiority remains understudied.
Methods: An institutional-based cohort study on 112 adult patients aged between 18-60 years was applied. 37 patients in the non-exposed group (Group N), 37 in the lidocaine group (Group L), and 38 in magnesium sulphate (Group M) were included. The hemodynamic parameters like heart rate, systolic, diastolic and mean arterial blood pressure at various time points up to 7 minutes post-intubation were recorded and the effect of both drugs to reduce hemodynamic responses was compared. Parametric data were analyzed using ANOVA and nonparametric data using the Kuruska-Wallis H rank test. P-value < 0.05 considered statistically significant.
Results: In all three groups, there was a statistically significant rise in heart rate and blood pressure from baseline. There was a statistically significant difference in mean heart rate throughout study minutes among the groups (p<0.001). However, there was no statistically significant difference in mean heart rate between Groups M and L at all post-intubation time intervals. In blood pressure at all three parameters there was statistically significant difference among groups at all-time points except no difference at 7th minutes in DBP. There was significantly lower blood pressure in group M compared to both groups.
Conclusion: In conclusion, prophylactic administration of magnesium sulphate and lidocaine was effective in attenuating hemodynamic responses to the stress effect of laryngoscopy and intubation. But based on our finding prophylaxis of magnesium sulphate is associated with a more favorable hemodynamic response.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
Similar articles
-
A Comprehensive Review of Magnesium Sulfate Infusion: Unveiling the Impact on Hemodynamic Stability During Laryngoscopy and Tracheal Intubation in Ear, Nose, and Throat Surgeries.Cureus. 2024 Mar 26;16(3):e57002. doi: 10.7759/cureus.57002. eCollection 2024 Mar. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 38681416 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparing the effects of magnesium sulfate and lidocaine spray on hemodynamic changes caused by laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation: a randomized clinical trial.BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Feb 13;25(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-02962-x. BMC Anesthesiol. 2025. PMID: 39948445 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Effects of lidocaine and magnesium sulfate in attenuating hemodynamic response to tracheal intubation: single-center, prospective, double-blind, randomized study.Braz J Anesthesiol. 2017 Jan-Feb;67(1):50-56. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2015.08.004. Epub 2016 Nov 22. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2017. PMID: 28017170 Clinical Trial.
-
Attenuation of haemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and oral endotracheal intubation in coronary artery bypass surgery patients: intravenous morphine and lidocaine versus intravenous morphine and lidocaine spray.J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2014 Jul-Sep;26(3):275-8. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2014. PMID: 25671925 Clinical Trial.
-
Effects of intravenous lidocaine and/or esmolol on hemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and intubation: a double-blind, controlled clinical trial.J Clin Anesth. 1996 Sep;8(6):491-6. doi: 10.1016/0952-8180(96)00109-2. J Clin Anesth. 1996. PMID: 8872690 Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
Magnesium Sulfate and Its Versatility in Anesthesia: A Comprehensive Review.Cureus. 2024 Mar 17;16(3):e56348. doi: 10.7759/cureus.56348. eCollection 2024 Mar. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 38633961 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Possible role of high calcium concentrations in rat neocortical neurons in inducing hyper excitatory behavior during emergence from sevoflurane: a proposed pathophysiology.Med Gas Res. 2024 Sep 1;14(3):115-120. doi: 10.4103/2045-9912.385942. Epub 2023 Sep 17. Med Gas Res. 2024. PMID: 39073339 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of intravenous versus nebulized magnesium sulfate on attenuation of hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy in adult patients undergoing elective surgery: A randomized, double-blind study.J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2025 Jul-Sep;41(3):538-542. doi: 10.4103/joacp.joacp_484_24. Epub 2025 Mar 22. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2025. PMID: 40635821 Free PMC article.
-
A Comprehensive Review of Magnesium Sulfate Infusion: Unveiling the Impact on Hemodynamic Stability During Laryngoscopy and Tracheal Intubation in Ear, Nose, and Throat Surgeries.Cureus. 2024 Mar 26;16(3):e57002. doi: 10.7759/cureus.57002. eCollection 2024 Mar. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 38681416 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparing the effects of magnesium sulfate and lidocaine spray on hemodynamic changes caused by laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation: a randomized clinical trial.BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Feb 13;25(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-02962-x. BMC Anesthesiol. 2025. PMID: 39948445 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Edward Morgan MSM G. Clinical Anesthesiology United States of America: McGraw-Hill; 2013. P 320–2
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical