Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 5;10(5):923.
doi: 10.3390/plants10050923.

Endophytic Strain Bacillus subtilis 26D Increases Levels of Phytohormones and Repairs Growth of Potato Plants after Colorado Potato Beetle Damage

Affiliations

Endophytic Strain Bacillus subtilis 26D Increases Levels of Phytohormones and Repairs Growth of Potato Plants after Colorado Potato Beetle Damage

Antonina Sorokan et al. Plants (Basel). .

Abstract

Plant damage caused by defoliating insects has a long-term negative effect on plant growth and productivity. Consequently, the restoration of plant growth after exposure to pathogens or pests is the main indicator of the effectiveness of the implemented defense reactions. A short-term Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say attack on potato tube-grown plantlets (Solanum tuberosum L.) led to a reduction of both the length and mass of the shoots in 9 days. The decrease of the content of phytohormones-indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), abscisic acid (ABA), zeatin and zeatin-riboside-in shoots of damaged potato plants was found. Endophytic strain Bacillus subtilis 26D (Cohn) is capable of secreting up to 83.6 ng/mL IAA and up to 150 ng/mL cytokinins into the culture medium. Inoculation of potato plants with cells of the B. subtilis 26D increases zeatin-riboside content in shoots and the mass of roots of undamaged plants, but does not influence content of IAA and ABA and growth of shoots. The presence of B. subtilis 26D in plant tissues promoted a rapid recovery of the growth rates of shoots, as well as the wet and dry mass of roots of plants after the pest attack, which we associate with the maintenance of a high level of IAA, ABA and cytokinins in their tissues.

Keywords: Bacillus subtilis; Leptinotarsa decemlineata; Solanum tuberosum; abscisic acid; endophyte; indole-3-acetic acid; zeatin; zeatin–riboside.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Influence of damage caused by CPB on the length of shoots (A) and the growth addition of shoots (B) of potato plants treated with water or suspension of B. subtilis 26D. The values are means, and the vertical bars represent standard errors. Data analyzed using two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test. Asterisks indicate means statistically different from the control at p ≤ 0.05. CPB—plants damaged by Colorado potato beetle.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Influence of B. subtilis 26D on fresh (A) and dry (B) weights of shoots and roots of potato plants on the 9th day post damage caused by CPBs. The values are means, and the vertical bars represent standard errors. Data analyzed using two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test. Asterisks indicate means statistically different from the control at p ≤ 0.05. c—control plants (water-treated intact plants); CPB—plants damaged by Colorado potato beetle.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Influence of B. subtilis 26D on the level of IAA (A) and ABA (B) in potato plants on the 1st, 2nd and 3rd day after damage caused by CPBs. The values are means, and the vertical bars represent standard errors. Data analyzed using two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test. Asterisks indicate means statistically different from the control at p ≤ 0.05. c—control plants (water-treated intact plants); CPB—plants damaged by Colorado potato beetle.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Influence of B. subtilis 26D on the level of zeatin (A) and zeatin–riboside (B) in potato plants on the 1st, 2nd and 3rd day after damage caused by CPBs. The values are means, and the vertical bars represent standard errors. Data analyzed using two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test. Asterisks indicate means statistically different from the control at p ≤ 0.05. c—control plants (water-treated intact plants); CPB—plants damaged by Colorado potato beetle.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Clements J., Olson J.M., Sanchez-Sedillo B., Bradford B., Groves R.L. Changes in emergence phenology, fatty acid composition, and xenobiotic metabolizing enzyme expression is associated with increased insecticide resistance in the Colorado potato beetle. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 2020;103:e21630. doi: 10.1002/arch.21630. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Isah T. Stress and defense responses in plant secondary metabolites production. Biol. Res. 2019;52:39. doi: 10.1186/s40659-019-0246-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kadoić-Balaško M., Mikac K.M., Bažok R., Lemic D. Modern techniques in Colorado Potato Beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say) control and resistance management: History review and future perspectives. Insects. 2020;11:581. doi: 10.3390/insects11090581. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tamošiūnė I., Stanienė G., Haimi P., Stanys V., Rugienius R., Baniulis D. Endophytic Bacillus and Pseudomonas spp. modulate apple shoot growth, cellular redox balance, and protein expression under in vitro conditions. Front. Plant Sci. 2018;9:889. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00889. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arkhipova T., Martynenko E., Sharipova G., Kuzmina L., Ivanov I., Garipova M., Kudoyarova G. Effects of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on the content of abscisic acid and salt resistance of wheat plants. Plants. 2020;9:1429. doi: 10.3390/plants9111429. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources