Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 15;9(5):553.
doi: 10.3390/biomedicines9050553.

Perioperative Vascular Biomarker Profiling in Elective Surgery Patients Developing Postoperative Delirium: A Prospective Cohort Study

Affiliations

Perioperative Vascular Biomarker Profiling in Elective Surgery Patients Developing Postoperative Delirium: A Prospective Cohort Study

Jan Menzenbach et al. Biomedicines. .

Abstract

Background: Postoperative delirium (POD) ranks among the most common complications in surgical patients. Blood-based biomarkers might help identify the patient at risk. This study aimed to assess how serum biomarkers with specificity for vascular and endothelial function and for inflammation are altered, prior to or following surgery in patients who subsequently develop POD.

Methods: This was a study on a subcohort of consecutively recruited elective non-cardiac as well as cardiac surgery patients (age > 60 years) of the single-center PROPDESC trial at a German tertiary care hospital. Serum was sampled prior to and following surgery, and the samples were subjected to bead-based multiplex analysis of 17 serum proteins (IL-3, IL-8, IL-10, Cripto, CCL2, RAGE, Resistin, ANGPT2, TIE2, Thrombomodulin, Syndecan-1, E-Selectin, VCAM-1, ICAM-1, CXCL5, NSE, and uPAR). Development of POD was assessed during the first five days after surgery, using the Confusion Assessment Method for ICU (CAM-ICU), the CAM, the 4-'A's test (4AT), and the Delirium Observation Scale (DOS). Patients were considered positive if POD was detected at least once during the visitation period by any of the applied methods. Non-parametric testing, as well as propensity score matching were used for statistical analysis.

Results: A total of 118 patients were included in the final analysis; 69% underwent non-cardiac surgery, median overall patient age was 71 years, and 59% of patients were male. In the whole cohort, incidence of POD was 28%. The male gender was significantly associated with the development of POD (p = 0.0004), as well as a higher ASA status III (p = 0.04). Incidence of POD was furthermore significantly increased in cardiac surgery patients (p = 0.002). Surgery induced highly significant changes in serum levels of almost all biomarkers except uPAR. In preoperative serum samples, none of the analyzed parameters was significantly altered in subsequent POD patients. In postoperative samples, CCL2 was significantly increased by a factor of 1.75 in POD patients (p = 0.03), as compared to the no-POD cohort. Following propensity score matching, CCL2 remained the only biomarker that showed significant differences in postoperative values (p = 0.01). In cardiac surgery patients, postoperative CCL2 serum levels were more than 3.5 times higher than those following non-cardiac surgery (p < 0.0001). Moreover, after cardiac surgery, Syndecan-1 serum levels were significantly increased in POD patients, as compared to no-POD cardiac surgery patients (p = 0.04).

Conclusions: In a mixed cohort of elective non-cardiac as well as cardiac surgery patients, preoperative serum biomarker profiling with specificity for vascular dysfunction and for systemic inflammation was not indicative of subsequent POD development. Surgery-induced systemic inflammation-as evidenced by the significant increase in CCL2 release-was associated with POD, particularly following cardiac surgery. In those patients, postoperative glycocalyx injury might furthermore contribute to POD development.

Keywords: CCL2; MCP-1; biomarker; cardiac surgery; elective surgery; glycocalyx; postoperative delirium; vascular inflammation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Pre- and postoperative serum biomarker profiling. Serum was sampled prior to and following surgery from a mixed cohort of consecutively recruited elective non-cardiac as well as cardiac surgery patients. Biomarker profiling was performed using the multiplex array technique. Data are given as median values (black dashed line) with 25th and 75th percentile (white dashed lines) and were compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. n = 118. ns = not significant, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.005. E-Sel = E-Selectin, ICAM-1 = Intercellular Adhesion Molecule 1, VCAM-1 = Vascular Cell Adhesion Protein 1, SDC1 = Syndecan-1, THBD = Thrombomodulin, ANGPT2 = Angiopoietin-2, TIE2 = Tyrosine Kinase with Immunoglobulin-like and EGF-like domains 2, IL-8 = Interleukin-8, CCL2 = CC-chemokine Ligand 2, RAGE = Receptor for Advanced Glycation Endproducts, CXCL5 = C-X-C Motif Chemokine 5, uPAR = Urokinase Plasminogen Activator Surface Receptor, and NSE = Neuron.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Pre- and postoperative serum biomarker profiling (no-POD and POD). Serum was sampled prior to (A) and following surgery (B) from a mixed cohort of consecutively recruited elective non-cardiac, as well as cardiac surgery patients. Biomarker profiling was performed using the multiplex array technique. The whole cohort was divided according to development of postoperative delirium (POD). Data are given as median values (black dashed line) with 25th and 75th percentile (white dashed lines) and were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. no POD: n = 85, POD: n = 33. ns = not significant, * p < 0.05. E-Sel = E-Selectin, ICAM-1 = Intercellular Adhesion Molecule 1, VCAM-1 = Vascular Cell Adhesion Protein 1, SDC1 = Syndecan-1, THBD = Thrombomodulin, ANGPT2 = Angiopoietin-2, TIE2 = Tyrosine Kinase with Immunoglobulin-like and EGF-like domains 2, IL-8 = Interleukin-8, CCL2 = CC-chemokine Ligand 2, RAGE = Receptor for Advanced Glycation Endproducts, CXCL5 = C-X-C Motif Chemokine 5, uPAR = Urokinase Plasminogen Activator Surface Receptor, and NSE = Neuron-specific Enolase.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Pre- and postoperative serum biomarker profiling (no-POD and POD) following propensity score matching. Serum was sampled prior to and following surgery from a mixed cohort of consecutively recruited elective non-cardiac as well as cardiac surgery patients. Biomarker profiling was performed using the multiplex array technique. Development of postoperative delirium (POD) was assessed, and POD-positive patients were matched with respect to no-POD controls using propensity score matching. Figure shows results for the CCL2 (CC-chemokine Ligand 2) serum levels. Data are given as median values (black dashed line) with 25th and 75th percentile (white dashed lines) and were compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum test. no POD: n = 33, POD: n = 33. ns = not significant, * p <0.05.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Pre- and postoperative serum biomarker profiling in cardiac and non-cardiac surgery patients. Serum was sampled prior to and following surgery from a mixed cohort of consecutively recruited elective non-cardiac as well as cardiac surgery patients. Biomarker profiling was performed using multiplex array technique. Development of postoperative delirium (POD) was assessed. (A) Prevalence of POD was significantly increased in cardiac surgery patients, as compared to non-cardiac surgery (18 out of 37 (49%) vs. 15 out of 81 patients (19%)). Fisher’s exact test. *** p < 0.005. (B) In cardiac surgery patients, CCL2 (CC-chemokine Ligand 2) showed a significant difference in postoperative absolute as well as fold-change increase, irrespective of POD development, as compared to the non-cardiac surgery patients. non-cardiac: n = 81, cardiac: n = 37. (C) In cardiac surgery patients, postoperative SDC1 (Syndecan-1) serum levels were significantly increased in patients that subsequently developed POD, as compared to the no-POD cardiac surgery patients. no POD: n = 19, POD: n = 18. (B,C) Data are given as median values (black dashed line) with 25th and 75th percentile (white dashed lines) and were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. ns = not significant, * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.005.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jin Z., Hu J., Ma D. Postoperative delirium: Perioperative assessment, risk reduction, and management. Br. J. Anaesth. 2020;125:492–504. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.06.063. - DOI - PubMed
    1. American Psychiatric Association . Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 5th ed. American Psychiatric Association; Arlington, VA, USA: 2013.
    1. Brown C.H., Laflam A., Max L., Lymar D., Neufeld K.J., Tian J., Shah A.S., Whitman G.J., Hogue C.W. The Impact of Delirium After Cardiac Surgical Procedures on Postoperative Resource Use. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2016;101:1663–1669. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.12.074. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Raats J.W., Van Eijsden W.A., Crolla R., Steyerberg E., Van Der Laan L. Risk Factors and Outcomes for Postoperative Delirium after Major Surgery in Elderly Patients. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0136071. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136071. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gleason L.J., Schmitt E.M., Kosar C.M., Tabloski P., Saczynski J.S., Robinson T.N., Cooper Z., Rogers S.O., Jones R.N., Marcantonio E.R., et al. Effect of Delirium and Other Major Complications on Outcomes After Elective Surgery in Older Adults. JAMA Surg. 2015;150:1134–1140. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.2606. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources