Impulsivity, Emotion Regulation, Cognitive Distortions and Attentional Bias in a Spanish Sample of Gambling Disorder Patients: Comparison between Online and Land-Based Gambling
- PMID: 34063619
- PMCID: PMC8124317
- DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18094869
Impulsivity, Emotion Regulation, Cognitive Distortions and Attentional Bias in a Spanish Sample of Gambling Disorder Patients: Comparison between Online and Land-Based Gambling
Abstract
Several risk factors have been related to the onset and maintenance of gambling disorder (GD). The aim of this study was to explore the differences in emotion dysregulation, impulsivity, cognitive distortions, and attentional bias between online and land-based gamblers. The sample consisted of 88 treatment-seeking patients from the Behavioral Addictions Unit at the Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona (Spain). Patients were divided into two groups by considering their main type of gambling, i.e., online (n = 26) and land-based gambling (n = 62). Online gamblers were younger, more often employed, with a higher educational level than land-based gamblers. Regarding the rest of the variables, statistically significant differences were only found in Positive Urgency, one of the UPPS-P subscales, in which the land-based gambling group scored higher than the online gambling group. In this exploratory study, individuals with online and land-based GD phenotypes did not differ either in difficulties in emotion regulation or in attentional and cognitive biases. However, land-based GD patients showed a higher tendency to succumb to strong impulses under the influence of positive emotions. These preliminary findings warrant the need to continue investigating GD phenotypes in larger patient samples.
Keywords: attentional bias; emotion regulation; gambling disorder; gambling-related cognition; impulsivity; online gambling.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Impulsivity and cognitive distortions in different clinical phenotypes of gambling disorder: Profiles and longitudinal prediction of treatment outcomes.Eur Psychiatry. 2019 Sep;61:9-16. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2019.06.006. Epub 2019 Jun 28. Eur Psychiatry. 2019. PMID: 31255958
-
Types of Emotion Regulation and Their Associations with Gambling: A Cross-Sectional Study with Disordered and Non-problem Ecuadorian Gamblers.J Gambl Stud. 2019 Sep;35(3):997-1013. doi: 10.1007/s10899-019-09868-7. J Gambl Stud. 2019. PMID: 31218574
-
The paradoxical relationship between emotion regulation and gambling-related cognitive biases.PLoS One. 2019 Aug 5;14(8):e0220668. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220668. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 31381598 Free PMC article.
-
From sign-tracking to attentional bias: Implications for gambling and substance use disorders.Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2020 Apr 20;99:109861. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2020.109861. Epub 2020 Jan 10. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2020. PMID: 31931091 Review.
-
[To an integrative management of pathological gamblers].Encephale. 2011 Dec;37(6):410-7. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2011.05.003. Epub 2011 Jul 5. Encephale. 2011. PMID: 22137212 Review. French.
References
-
- Estévez A., Rodríguez R., Díaz N., Granero R., Mestre-Bach G., Steward T., Fernández-Aranda F., Aymamí N., Gómez-Peña M., Pino-Gutiérrez A.D., et al. How do online sports gambling disorder patients compare with land-based patients? J. Behav. Addict. 2017;6:1–9. doi: 10.1556/2006.6.2017.067. - DOI - PMC - PubMed