Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 May 21;11(6):1483.
doi: 10.3390/ani11061483.

Pain Management in Farm Animals: Focus on Cattle, Sheep and Pigs

Affiliations
Review

Pain Management in Farm Animals: Focus on Cattle, Sheep and Pigs

Paulo V Steagall et al. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

Pain causes behavioral, autonomic, and neuroendocrine changes and is a common cause of animal welfare compromise in farm animals. Current societal and ethical concerns demand better agricultural practices and improved welfare for food animals. These guidelines focus on cattle, sheep, and pigs, and present the implications of pain in terms of animal welfare and ethical perspectives, and its challenges and misconceptions. We provide an overview of pain management including assessment and treatment applied to the most common husbandry procedures, and recommendations to improve animal welfare in these species. A cost-benefit analysis of pain mitigation is discussed for food animals as well as the use of pain scoring systems for pain assessment in these species. Several recommendations are provided related to husbandry practices that could mitigate pain and improve farm animal welfare. This includes pain assessment as one of the indicators of animal welfare, the use of artificial intelligence for automated methods and research, and the need for better/appropriate legislation, regulations, and recommendations for pain relief during routine and husbandry procedures.

Keywords: analgesia; animal welfare; cattle; cost-benefit; ethics; pain; pig; sheep.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Stewart M., Verkerk G.A., Stafford K.J., Schaefer A.L., Webster J.R. Noninvasive assessment of autonomic activity for evaluation of pain in calves, using surgical castration as a model. J. Dairy Sci. 2010;93:3602–3609. doi: 10.3168/jds.2010-3114. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Raja S.N., Carr D.B., Cohen M., Finnerup N.B., Flor H., Gibson S. The revised International Association for the Study of Pain definition of pain: Concepts, challenges, and compromises. Pain. 2020;161:1976–1982. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001939. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Peterson N.C., Nunamaker E.A., Turner P.V. To Treat or Not to Treat: The Effects of Pain on Experimental Parameters. Comp. Med. 2017;67:469–482. - PMC - PubMed
    1. UK Farm Animal Welfare Council Five Freedoms. [(accessed on 4 January 2021)];1979 Available online: https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20121010012427/http://www.faw....
    1. Mellor D. Operational Details of the Five Domains Model and Its Key Applications to the Assessment and Management of Animal Welfare. Animals. 2017;7:60. doi: 10.3390/ani7080060. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources