Polydioxanone-Based Membranes for Bone Regeneration
- PMID: 34064251
- PMCID: PMC8196877
- DOI: 10.3390/polym13111685
Polydioxanone-Based Membranes for Bone Regeneration
Abstract
Resorbable synthetic and natural polymer-based membranes have been extensively studied for guided tissue regeneration. Alloplastic biomaterials are often used for tissue regeneration due to their lower immunoreactivity when compared with allogeneic and xenogeneic materials. Plenum® Guide is a synthetic membrane material based on polydioxanone (PDO), whose surface morphology closely mimics the extracellular matrix. In this study, Plenum® Guide was compared with collagen membranes as a barrier material for bone-tissue regeneration in terms of acute and subchronic systemic toxicity. Moreover, characterizations such as morphology, thermal analysis (Tm = 107.35 °C and crystallinity degree = 52.86 ± 2.97 %, final product), swelling (thickness: 0.25 mm ≅ 436% and 0.5 mm ≅ 425% within 24 h), and mechanical tests (E = 30.1 ± 6.25 MPa; σ = 3.92 ± 0.28 MPa; ε = 287.96 ± 34.68%, final product) were performed. The in vivo results revealed that the PDO membranes induced a slightly higher quantity of newly formed bone tissue than the control group (score: treated group = 15, control group = 13) without detectable systemic toxicity (clinical signs and evaluation of the membranes after necropsy did not result in differences between groups, i.e., non-reaction -> tissue-reaction index = 1.3), showing that these synthetic membranes have the essential characteristics for an effective tissue regeneration. Human adipose-derived stem cells (hASCs) were seeded on PDO membranes; results demonstrated efficient cell migration, adhesion, spread, and proliferation, such that there was a slightly better hASC osteogenic differentiation on PDO than on collagen membranes. Hence, Plenum® Guide membranes are a safe and efficient alternative for resorbable membranes for tissue regeneration.
Keywords: bone regeneration; membrane; polydioxanone; scaffold.
Conflict of interest statement
This research was funded by M3 Health Ind. Com. de Prod. Med. Odont. e Correlatos S.A., Jundiaí, Brazil. Sybele Saska, Livia Pilatti, Edvaldo Santos de Sousa Silva and Magda Nagasawa are employees of M3 Health Ind. Com. de Prod. Med. Odont. e Correlatos S.A., Jundiaí, Brazil, and declare conflicts of interest. Samy Tunchel, Alberto Blay, and Jamil Shibli have financial relationships (partnerships) with M3 Health Ind. Com. de Prod. Med. Odont. e Correlatos S.A., Jundiaí, Brazil, and declare conflicts of interest. The remaining authors (Diana Camara, Nelson Lizier, Eduardo Finger, Marta Dyszkiewicz Konwinska, and Bartosz Kempisty) declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Rowland D.C.L., Aquilina T., Klein A., Hakimi O., Alexis-Mouthuy P., Carr A.J., Snelling S.J.B. A comparative evaluation of the effect of polymer chemistry and fiber orientation on mesenchymal stem cell differentiation. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A. 2016;104:2843–2853. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.35829. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
