Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 May 11;18(10):5072.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph18105072.

Rise of Clinical Studies in the Field of Machine Learning: A Review of Data Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov

Affiliations
Review

Rise of Clinical Studies in the Field of Machine Learning: A Review of Data Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov

Claus Zippel et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Although advances in machine-learning healthcare applications promise great potential for innovative medical care, few data are available on the translational status of these new technologies. We aimed to provide a comprehensive characterization of the development and status quo of clinical studies in the field of machine learning. For this purpose, we performed a registry-based analysis of machine-learning-related studies that were published and first available in the ClinicalTrials.gov database until 2020, using the database's study classification. In total, n = 358 eligible studies could be included in the analysis. Of these, 82% were initiated by academic institutions/university (hospitals) and 18% by industry sponsors. A total of 96% were national and 4% international. About half of the studies (47%) had at least one recruiting location in a country in North America, followed by Europe (37%) and Asia (15%). Most of the studies reported were initiated in the medical field of imaging (12%), followed by cardiology, psychiatry, anesthesia/intensive care medicine (all 11%) and neurology (10%). Although the majority of the clinical studies were still initiated in an academic research context, the first industry-financed projects on machine-learning-based algorithms are becoming visible. The number of clinical studies with machine-learning-related applications and the variety of medical challenges addressed serve to indicate their increasing importance in future clinical care. Finally, they also set a time frame for the adjustment of medical device-related regulation and governance.

Keywords: ClinicalTrials.gov; device regulation; digital health; machine learning; registry analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart for the selection procedure of the ML-related clinical study entries considered for the quantitative registry analysis. Source: Own figure based on the evaluation of the ClincalTrials.gov dataset [36].
Figure 2
Figure 2
Number of clinical studies related to ML by year of publication on ClinicalTrials.gov (n = 358). Source: Own figure based on the evaluation of the ClincalTrials.gov dataset [36].
Figure 3
Figure 3
Study entries in the field of ML by study-initiating medical specialty/field (n = 358). Source: Own figure based on the evaluation of the ClincalTrials.gov dataset [36]. * Dianostic Radiology/Biomedical Imaging, Radiation Oncology, Nuclear Medicine.

References

    1. Grant J., Green L., Mason B. Basic research and health: A reassessment of the scientific basis for the support of biomedical science. Res. Eval. 2003;12:217–224. doi: 10.3152/147154403781776618. - DOI
    1. Green L.W., Ottoson J.M., García C., Hiatt R.A. Diffusion theory and knowledge dissemination, utilization, and integration in public health. Annu. Rev. Public Health. 2009;30:151–174. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.031308.100049. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Morris Z.S., Wooding S., Grant J. The answer is 17 years, what is the question: Understanding time lags in translational research. J. R. Soc. Med. 2011;104:510–520. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2011.110180. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Contopoulos-Ioannidis D.G., Alexiou G.A., Gouvias T.C., Ioannidis J.P. Medicine. Life cycle of translational research for medical interventions. Science. 2008;321:1298–1299. doi: 10.1126/science.1160622. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Trochim W., Kane C., Graham M.J., Pincus H.A. Evaluating translational research: A process marker model. Clin. Transl. Sci. 2011;4:153–162. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2011.00291.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources