Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 11;9(5):566.
doi: 10.3390/healthcare9050566.

Prevalence of Psychological Distress and Its Risk Factors in Patients with Primary Bone and Soft Tissue Tumors

Masato Ise  1 , Eiji Nakata  1 , Yoshimi Katayama  2 , Masanori Hamada  2 , Toshiyuki Kunisada  1 , Tomohiro Fujiwara  1 , Ryuichi Nakahara  1 , Shouta Takihira  1 , Kohei Sato  1 , Yoshiteru Akezaki  3 , Masuo Senda  2 , Toshifumi Ozaki  1
Affiliations

Prevalence of Psychological Distress and Its Risk Factors in Patients with Primary Bone and Soft Tissue Tumors

Masato Ise et al. Healthcare (Basel). .

Abstract

Psychological distress is common in patients with soft tissue and bone tumors. We first investigated its frequency and the associated risk factors in patients with pre-operative bone and soft tissue tumors. Participants included 298 patients with bone and soft tissue tumors who underwent surgery in our institution between 2015 and 2020. Psychological distress was evaluated by the Distress and Impact Thermometer (DIT) that consists of two types of questions (questions about the severity of the patient's distress (DIT-D) and its impact (DIT-I)). We used a cut-off point of 4 on the DIT-D and 3 on the DIT-I for screening patients with psychological distress. We therefore investigated: (1) the prevalence of psychological distress as assessed with DIT or distress thermometer (DT), which can be decided by DIT-D ≥ 4, (2) what are the risk factors for the prevalence of psychological distress, and (3) what is the number of patients who consulted a psychiatrist for psychological distress in patients with pre-operative bone and soft tissue tumors. With DIT and DT, we identified 64 patients (21%) and 95 patients (32%), respectively, with psychological distress. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that older age, sex (female), malignancy (malignant or intermediate tumor), a lower Barthel Index, and higher numeric rating scale were risk factors for psychological distress. Two patients (3%) consulted a psychiatrist after surgery. In conclusion, careful attention to psychological distress is needed, especially for female patients, older patients, and those with malignant soft or bone tissue tumors who have more than moderate pain.

Keywords: bone and soft tissue tumor; distress and impact thermometer; psychological distress; surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (e.g., consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Girgis A., Smith A.B., Durcinoska I. Screening for distress in survivorship. Curr. Opin. Support. Palliat. Care. 2018;12:86–91. doi: 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000328. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yeh M.L., Chung Y.C., Hsu M.Y., Hsu C.C. Quantifying psychological distress among cancer patients in interventions and scales: A systematic review. Curr. Pain Headache Rep. 2014;18:399. doi: 10.1007/s11916-013-0399-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Akizuki N., Yamawaki S., Akechi T., Nakano T., Uchitomi Y. Development of an Impact Thermometer for use in combination with the Distress Thermometer as a brief screening tool for adjustment disorders and/or major depression in cancer patients. J. Pain Symptom Manag. 2005;29:91–99. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2004.04.016. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baken D.M., Woolley C. Validation of the Distress Thermometer, Impact Thermometer and combinations of these in screening for distress. Psychooncology. 2011;20:609–614. doi: 10.1002/pon.1934. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fujii A., Yamada Y., Takayama K., Nakano T., Kishimoto J., Morita T., Nakanishi Y. Longitudinal assessment of pain management with the pain management index in cancer outpatients receiving chemotherapy. Support. Care Cancer. 2017;25:925–932. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3482-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources