Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2021 May 20;13(5):1733.
doi: 10.3390/nu13051733.

Self-Reported Nutritional Factors Are Associated with Weight Loss at 18 Months in a Self-Managed Commercial Program with Food Categorization System: Observational Study

Affiliations
Observational Study

Self-Reported Nutritional Factors Are Associated with Weight Loss at 18 Months in a Self-Managed Commercial Program with Food Categorization System: Observational Study

Ellen S Mitchell et al. Nutrients. .

Abstract

Little is known about nutritional factors during weight loss on digital commercial weight loss programs. We examined how nutritional factors relate to weight loss for individuals after 4 and 18 months on a mobile commercial program with a food categorization system based on energy density (Noom). This is a two-part (retrospective and cross-sectional) cohort study. Two time points were used for analysis: 4 months and 18 months. For 4-month analyses, current Noom users who met inclusion criteria (n = 9880) were split into 5% or more body weight loss and stable weight loss (0 ± 1%) groups. Individuals who fell into one of these groups were analyzed at 4 months (n = 3261). For 18-month analyses, individuals from 4-month analyses who were still on Noom 18 months later were invited to take a one-time survey (n = 803). At 18 months 148 participants were analyzed. Noom has a system categorizing foods as low-, medium-, and high-energy-dense. Measures were self-reported proportions of low-, medium-, and high-energy-dense foods, and self-reported nutritional factors (fruit and vegetable intake, dietary quality, nutrition knowledge, and food choice). Nutritional factors were derived from validated survey measures, and food choice from a novel validated computerized task in which participants chose a food they would want to eat right now. ANOVAs compared participants with 5% or more body weight loss and participants with stable weight (0 ± 1%) at 4 months on energy density proportions. Analyses at 18 months compared nutritional factors across participants with >10% (high weight loss), 5-10% (moderate weight loss), and less than 5% body weight loss (low weight loss), and then assessed associations between nutritional factors and weight loss. Individuals with greater weight loss reported consuming higher proportions of low-energy-dense foods and lower proportions of high-energy-dense foods than individuals with less weight loss at 4 months and 18 months (all ps < 0.02). Individuals with greater weight loss had higher fruit and vegetable intake (p = 0.03), dietary quality (p = 0.02), nutrition knowledge (p < 0.001), and healthier food choice (p = 0.003) at 18 months. Only nutrition knowledge and food choice were associated with weight loss at 18 months (B = -19.44, 95% CI: -33.19 to -5.69, p = 0.006; B = -5.49, 95% CI: -8.87 to -2.11, p = 0.002, respectively). Our results highlight the potential influence of nutrition knowledge and food choice in weight loss on a self-managed commercial program. We also found for the first time that in-the-moment inclination towards food even when just depicted is associated with long-term weight loss.

Keywords: energy density; food choice; nutrition knowledge; obesity; technologies; weight loss.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Authors E.S.M., Q.Y., A.S.H., H.B., C.N.M., L.D., and A.M. are employees of Noom Inc. and have received salary and stock options for their employment.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hales C.M., Fryar C.D., Carroll M.D., Freedman D.S., Ogden C.L. Trends in Obesity and Severe Obesity Prevalence in US Youth and Adults by Sex and Age, 2007–2008 to 2015–2016. JAMA. 2018;319:1723–1725. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.3060. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pi-Sunyer F.X. The Obesity Epidemic: Pathophysiology and Consequences of Obesity. Obes. Res. 2002;10(Suppl. 2):97S–104S. doi: 10.1038/oby.2002.202. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Metcalf K.B. Can Obesity and Health Coexist? Nutr. Today. 2019;54:64–66. doi: 10.1097/NT.0000000000000328. - DOI
    1. Ryan D.H., Yockey S.R. Weight Loss and Improvement in Comorbidity: Differences at 5%, 10%, 15%, and Over. Curr. Obes. Rep. 2017;6:187–194. doi: 10.1007/s13679-017-0262-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stubbs J., Whybrow S., Teixeira P., Blundell J., Lawton C., Westenhoefer J., Engel D., Shepherd R., Mcconnon Á., Gilbert P., et al. Problems in Identifying Predictors and Correlates of Weight Loss and Maintenance: Implications for Weight Control Therapies Based on Behaviour Change: Predicting Weight Outcomes. Obes. Rev. 2011:113–120. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2011.00883.x. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms