Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 May 12;11(5):403.
doi: 10.3390/jpm11050403.

Current Status and Prospects of Immunotherapy for Gynecologic Melanoma

Affiliations
Review

Current Status and Prospects of Immunotherapy for Gynecologic Melanoma

Mayuka Anko et al. J Pers Med. .

Abstract

Gynecologic melanomas are rare and have a poor prognosis. Although immunotherapy (immune checkpoint inhibitors) and targeted therapy has greatly improved the systemic treatment of cutaneous melanoma (CM) in recent years, its efficacy in gynecologic melanomas remains uncertain because of the rarity of this malignancy and its scarce literature. This review aimed to evaluate the literature of gynecologic melanomas treated with immunotherapy and targeted therapy through a PubMed search. We identified one study focusing on the overall survival of gynecologic melanomas separately and five case series and nine case reports concentrating on gynecologic melanomas treated with an immune checkpoint inhibitor and/or targeted therapy. Furthermore, the KIT mutation has the highest rate among all mutations in mucosal melanoma types. The KIT inhibitors (Tyrosine kinase inhibitors: TKIs) imatinib and nilotinib could be the treatment options. Moreover, immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with KIT inhibitors may potentially treat cases of resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors. However, because of the different conditions and a small number of cases, it is difficult to evaluate the efficacy of immunotherapy and targeted therapy for gynecologic melanoma rigorously at this time. Further prospective cohort or randomized trials of gynecologic melanoma alone are needed to assess the treatment with solid evidence.

Keywords: KIT; gynecologic melanoma; imatinib; immune checkpoint inhibitor; immunotherapy; melanoma; mucosal melanoma; targeted therapy; vulvovaginal melanoma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declare no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gadducci A., Carinelli S., Guerrieri M.E., Aletti G.D. Melanoma of the Lower Genital Tract: Prognostic Factors and Treatment Modalities. Gynecol. Oncol. 2018;150:180–189. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.04.562. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wellbrock C., Hurlstone A. BRAF as Therapeutic Target in Melanoma. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2010;80:561–567. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2010.03.019. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Long G.V., Menzies A.M., Nagrial A.M., Haydu L.E., Hamilton A.L., Mann G.J., Hughes T.M., Thompson J.F., Scolyer R.A., Kefford R.F. Prognostic and Clinicopathologic Associations of Oncogenic BRAF in Metastatic Melanoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 2011;29:1239–1246. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.32.4327. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Davies H., Bignell G.R., Cox C., Stephens P., Edkins S., Clegg S., Teague J., Woffendin H., Garnett M.J., Bottomley W., et al. Mutations of the BRAF Gene in Human Cancer. Nature. 2002;417:949–954. doi: 10.1038/nature00766. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kakadia S., Yarlagadda N., Awad R., Kundranda M., Niu J., Naraev B., Mina L., Dragovich T., Gimbel M., Mahmoud F. Mechanisms of Resistance to BRAF and MEK Inhibitors and Clinical Update of US Food and Drug Administration-Approved Targeted Therapy in Advanced Melanoma. Onco Targets Ther. 2018;11:7095–7107. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S182721. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources